Adrian Wainer

2006-07-09T12:09:00.000-07:00

New Labour double-dealing in The NatWest Three Affair

06 July 2006

A copy of an e-mail I have sent to the Baroness Scotland

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

Misleading the House

06 July 2006

To:
The Baroness Scotland
The House of Lords
London England

From:
Adrian Wainer

Dear Baroness Scotland,

On BBC Radio 4, between 8.30 AM and 9.00 AM local British time 5th July 2006 there was broadcast the programme "Yesterday in Parliament" in which you deflected and, or, refused to answer a question put to you, I think by a fellow Honourable Member in I believe the House of Lords, [ location: debating chamber? ], on the grounds of "sub judice" rules. On the, July 6 2006, edition of that programme, I believe I heard that, you have apologized for "misleading" the House, presumably The House of Lords.

It is my understanding that, the matter which you apparently claimed was sub-judice, but which was not, related to the proposed extradition of Mr Gary Mulgrew, Mr David Bermingham and Mr Giles Darby from the United Kingdom to the United States of America, whose situation is refered to in "Daily Telegraph" articles

Three could face lockdown in a wire cage
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/07/06/natwest206.xml

What will I tell children, asks Natwest wife
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/07/06/natwest106.xml

At last Blair promises to help NatWest Three, but can he deliver
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/07/06/natwest06.xml

It was my understanding, that the fast-track extradition procedure was designed as primarily a counter-terrorist iniative. Now I would assume, it might have genuine benefits to fighting terrorism, if a law which was implemented primarily to fight terrorism has a broader scope, so that persons [ of which I believe there is no suspicion of, in the case of the above gentlemen ] who were suspected of engageing in terrorism could not escape extradition by claiming their activities were "merely" criminal rather than terroristic. How ever, any such legitimacy one might subscribe to the above proposed extradition of the above men, immediately breaks down as a result of the fact, that Her Majesty's Government by chooseing to leave Victorian sub judice laws in place, whilst this country [ i.e. the United Kingdom ] is faced by threats which were quite simply unimaginable to the Victorians who framed Britain's laws. Simply and brutally put, Irish Fenians in the 1880s or thereabouts, throwing a homemade handgrenade through the door of a London police station and killing one or two policemen is not the same thing as e.g. al-Qaeda hijacking an Airbus A-380 airliner and smashing it in to the Dungeness nuclear power station.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeness_Power_Station

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380

If, the present Labour Government is not completely, mad, insane, in-competent or just plain vicious, it will block the extradition of the three men named above and institute a far reaching reform of the sub-judice laws, which would allow responsible journalists to report facts concerning terrorist activity, which they are currently prohibited from doing so by the present sub judice laws, as this sub judice prohibition is constitueing a critical threat to the survival of the British people.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/3081534.stm

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-06-03T11:45:00.000-07:00

Canada comes under attack by Islamonazis.

from the Canadian paper Toronto Star
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Render&c=Page&cid=968332188492

Most arrested from GTA
“This group posed a real and serious threat,” says senior RCMP officer
Jun. 3, 2006. 01:08 PM
JESSICA LEEDER AND HAROLD LEVY
TORONTO STAR

Quote

At a news conference earlier in the day, a CSIS official said a series of terrorist attacks plotted against unspecified targets in southern Ontario were “inspired by Al Qaeda,” adding that the ring of suspects arrested posed a “real and serious” threat.

Three tonnes of ammonium nitrate, a commonly used fertilizer used to make explosives, were recovered by police, who say that’s three times the amount used in the bombing of a government building in Oklahoma that killed 168 people.

UnQuote

Http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1149329598732&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-05-29T07:18:00.000-07:00

Essex Girl Versus the EuroNazis' and the Islamofascist Axis of Evil's Quislings in the British Parliament

Bronze of Queen Boadicea of the Iceni by Thomas Thorneycroft
http://transsexy.geophys.mcgill.ca/~olivia/BOUDICA/

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer 29 May 2006

the following appeared in the British newspaper "The Daily Telegraph" letters to the editor section dated Monday 29th May 2006

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/05/29/dt2901.xml
Essex girl

Sir - It is fitting that Boadicea is charging the Houses of Parliament (Letters, May 27): independent, strong-willed Essex folk rising up against an oppressive, pan-European political elite.

Douglas Carswell MP, Clacton-on-Sea, Essex

2006-05-29T06:47:00.000-07:00

Welcome to Hell

To:
Patience Wheatcroft
Editor
The Sunday Telegraph [ newspaper ]
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
Dublin
Ireland
Http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

28 May 2006

Dear Madame Editor

Concerning The Sunday Telegraph's [ newsprint edition Sunday May 28 2006 ] front page leading article,

Blair beefed up his Iran speech to please Bush
By Toby Harnden in Washington and Patrick Hennessy
(Filed: 28/05/2006)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/05/28/nblair28.xml
and leading editorial

Once again, Mr Blair puts America first
(Filed: 28/05/2006)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/05/28/dl2801.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/05/28/ixopinion.html

Carry on like this and hopefully you will be looking for a new job. I take offence at your runing one of the World's great papers in to the ground. I take even greater offence at The Sunday Telegraph being hijacked as a pro-IslamoNazi propaganda sheet, in respect that the most influential grouping within IslamoNazi Islamofascism, is Arab racial supremacist Islamofascism which regards as it being entirely moral and correct and a posative good that they should work towards the genocidal extermination of the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples of the British Isles and their replacement with immigrant Arab Wahabi Muslim settlers.

As your paper writes in the leading editorial.

Quote
The threat to our security will have to be direct and palpable for military action to gain majority support: dodgy dossiers and idealistic pronouncements will not be enough.
Unquote

Presumably you would have Her Majesty's British Government wait until British hospitals start overflowing with the victims of a Jihadi biological suicide bomber attack involving bio-engineered Smallpox with a genetic sequence configured to neutralize the protection provided by the conventional smallpox vaccine and cooked-up in a bio-weapons lab in Syria or Iran, as I said before, "Welcome to Hell",.

http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/pages/events/dark_winter/dark_winter.html

http://www.upmc-biosecurity.org/pages/events/dark_winter/DARK%20WINTER.pdf

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-05-29T06:06:00.000-07:00

From a place before time and history, to fight an evil beyond imagination, Come the Longships.

23 May 2006

To:
The Secretary of the Navy
1000 Navy Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20350-1000
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/leadership/ldrDisplay.asp?m=325
Care of: the Office of the President
The White House
Washington DC
USA
http://www.whitehouse.gov/>

From:
Adrian Wainer
Http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com

photograph of archaeological recovery of Anglo-Saxon ship, location Sutton Hoo England.
http://www.englishheathenism.homestead.com/shipburial.html
http://www.suttonhoo.org/

http://ecuip.lib.uchicago.edu/diglib/social/worldsfair_1893/gallery/07-11i_transportation.html

Some shipworkers say the hairs stood up on the backs of their necks the first time they touched it. Others have postponed their retirement so they can be part of the project.
One worker, Tony Quaglino, said: “I was going to go in October 2004 after 40 years here, but I put it off when I found out I could be working on New York. This is sacred and it makes me very proud.” Glen Clement, a paint superintendent, said: “Nobody passes by that bow section without knocking on it. Everybody knows what it is made from and what it’s about.”

from The Times article:

The Times May 22, 2006

Warship built out of Twin Towers wreckage
By Tom Baldwin
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2191181,00.html

Best And Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-05-03T09:42:00.000-07:00

Fooling none of the people, all of the time and you aren't either!

3rd May 2006

To:
The Acting Editor
The Daily Telegraph
Mr John Bryant Esquire
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
Http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com

Dear Mr Bryant

Concerning your leading editorial, which appeared in The Daily Telegrpah 03 May 2006 page 19, titled:

Fooling none of the people, all of the time
(Filed: 03/05/2006)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/05/03/dl0301.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/05/03/ixopinion.html

John Prescott is a person who has had sexual relations with a woman who does not happen to be his wife, though the worst of the faults of the present Labour Government happens to be that they have in the past and are continueing to pro-actively co-operate with Islamofascists and Islamofascist Arab racial supremacists whose objective in relation to the United Kingdom is to destroy the United Kingdom as a Sovereign democratic State which operates to the morality of secular enlightenment and christian values and incorporate the United Kingdom territory in to a pan-European Wahabi colony of Saudi Arabia, with forced conversion to Wahabi Islam at the point of the sword for the United Kingdom's non-Muslim citizens and very possably the extermination of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples of the British Isles on racial grounds, regardless of whether they would submit to conversion to Wahabi Islam or not, that by no means is anything more than the worst of the faults of the present Labour Government, which are legion. And your paper makes the sexual adventures of John Prescott the strategic and principle point of the first paragraph of your leading editorial.

Given this Labour Government is supporting Fascists who wish to destroy the British State and very possably plan to exterminate the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples of these Islands, the importance that you give to the sexual adventures of the Prescott person in your editorial, is beyond belief. When Prescott has been attacked in other places in your paper and in other papers, I would not criticise the publications for doing so, except where they might lose sight of how Prescott's sex life figures as a matter of importance, which is not a lot or at least not a lot when compared to other things Labour have been up to.

You or whoever has written your editorial writes:
Quote
Dr David Kelly - has died as a result of the Government's shabby handling of this issue.
UnQuote
That is factually incorrect, Dr David Kelly chose to commit suicide [ NB note the word "chose" ] if everybody decided to commit suicide for the reason that the World is untidy, messy and quite often unjust I do not think there would be anybody in the United Kingdom or anywhere else left alive. How do you think that the likes of RAF Bomber Command Officers felt sending their pilots to attack the German lines in 1940 in the motorized coffin Fairey Battle light bombers or British Army officers ordering the rear-guard at Dunkirk in 1940 to hold off Hitler's SS Panzers with nothing more than First World War Lee Enfield bolt action rifles, should they have committed suicide rather than order their comrades to their destruction.

Quote:
Our armed forces are underfunded and overstretched, and put in lethal danger in a war from which there is still no obvious exit.
UnQuote

It is an entirely proper criticism of the Labour Government to say that the UK Armed Forces are "underfunded", and it is an entirely proper criticism of the Labour Government to say the UK Armed Forces are "overstretched" in so far as the Labour Government has not provided the UK Armed Forces with the equipement and manpower essential to their duties. However, I believe your editorial makes an additional implied criticism in respect of the use of the word "overstretched" and that is that, HM Armed Forces should never have been involved in Iraq and therefor, they could not have and should not have been "overstretched" by a commitment to Iraq, since they should never have been sent to Iraq. Since neither your paper, nor any other paper [ in so far as I am aware of ], which has been critical of the deployment of British Armed forces to Iraq has ever raised the folowing issue, I will put it to you here. And that is, to have left Saddam Hussein in place after 9/11 and as after 9/11 he continued to finance international Islamofascist terrorism, he continued to hurl threats at America and the West, he sought to ally his regime ideologically with Islamofascist jihad, he went to considerable efforts to convince just about everybody that he had an active WMD development programme, well to leave Saddam Hussein in place in such circumstances would be to risk giveing the impression to every two-bit Muslim and Arab dictatorship and major non-state Muslim or Arab terrorist actors such as e.g. al-Qaeda, that they could detonate a 10 kilotonne covertly placed no warning nuclear weapon in a large Western City such e.g. New York, New York USA or London, England and the West would do precisely nothing.

Quote:
and put in lethal danger in a war from which there is still no obvious exit.
UnQuote

Sorry War is not some sort of sports game, in which people earn sheds loads of money for kicking a ball round a field and get called "heroes" for no particular reason I can see. Quote "lethal danger" UnQuote; Generally, in a war there are people with guns and they use them to try to kill the people from the other side, to the charactor who wrote your editorial it seems some sort of a surprize that the Islamofascists and the Arab racial supremacists in Iraq are going to try and kill British soldiers and either way whether that would have been a surprize or not to the editorial writer, he or she certainly seems to be demanding that the British Army should only be used in Wars where the enemy would not be trying to kill them, which for example would have meant Neville Chamberlain should not have gone to War against the Third Reich in 1939. Quote "war from which there is still no obvious exit." UnQuote, I do not suppose Winston Churchill had an exit strategy in 1940 when he decided to both order the evacuation of the BEF from Dunkirk and to fight on, but since the only sure fire exit strategy from the War against the Islamofascists and the Islamofascist Arab racial supremacists is to surrender to them, I think rather as I suppose Churchill did that if the worst came to the worst it would be better to go-down fighting than patiently and politely line up to be marched off to the gas chambers and be made in to soap.

http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/photos/poland_and_ukraine/pages/Gate%20to%20Auschwitz%201.htm

Auschwitz anyone?

With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-05-02T08:37:00.000-07:00

Poor Britain, so far from Mexico and so near to Allah

May 2 2006

To:
President George W Bush
The White House
Washington DC
United Sates of America

From:
Adrian Wainer
adrianwainer.blogspot.com

Dear Mr Bush,

There is a rather silly saying "Poor Mexico, so far from God and so near to the United States", silly because it was really only from the late 19th early 20th Century that the Roman Catholic Church fully reconciled itself to the legitimacy of the secular democratic state and the United States of America for all its faults, has been for many Mexican immigrants a land of hope, freedom and eventually prosperity.

What would be more true is to say, "Poor Britain, so far from Mexico and so near to Allah", as the leading editorial of Tuesday 2nd May 2006 in the quality British newspaper The Daily Telegraph describes:

We can no longer dodge the immigration issue
(Filed: 02/05/2006)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/05/02/dl0201.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/05/02/ixopinion.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-04-30T11:35:00.000-07:00

Hit me Osama one more time!

30th April 2006

To:
The Editor
The Times
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
Http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com

Dear Sir,

Concerning former Conservative MP Mr Matthew Parris' article which appeared in The Times, edition Saturday 29 April 2006 titled

April 26: Jack Straw or Alan Johnson will have reason to remember it
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2156629,00.html

I do not know if there is an official "Homosexuals for a Sharia Britain" organization, but if there is perhaps Mr Parris should give consideration to joining. If anybody wants to accuse me of hateing homosexuals for writeing this item, they can but they would be wrong. I do not have a problem with homosexuals, I have a problem with do gooder idiots like Mr Parris who are doing their best to destroy the United Kingdom and get us all killed, if he wants to live in a Sharia state he should pack his bags and go and live in Saudi Arabia and he should invite European Union Commissioner and self appointed Grand Imam of Europe Peter Mandelson to join him. What Mr Parris ignores in his article, is that the Labour Government is a disgrace and the only reasonable thing they should do, is have Prime Minister Tony Blair call to HM Queen to ask for Parliament to be disolved and an election called, as they have totally lost the confidence of any sane person in the United Kingdom.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-04-20T11:53:00.000-07:00

This should please the PC pseudo-liberal crypto-fascists! Oink Oink!

http://www.hlasek.com/sus_scrofa_d18.html

It seems that at least one institute of learning in the shape of the "Hawza Ilmiyya of London" and "Islamic College for Advanced Studies" have fully embraced PC [ i.e. politically correct ] pseudo-liberal crypto-fascism.

The Times April 20, 2006

Muslim students 'being taught to despise unbelievers as filth'
By Sean O'Neill

Pupils protest as college linked to Iran puts fundamentalist text on curriculum, reports our correspondent

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2142403,00.html

Leading articles

The Times April 20, 2006

Preacher training
Moderate imams are essential for moderate Islam

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2142157,00.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Protect Britain's Wild Boars
"Brits With Attitude"
http://www.britishwildboar.org.uk/

2006-04-17T05:30:00.000-07:00

A Good, Good Friday with RTE, 14 April 2006,.

Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Jonathan Sacks writeing in The Times.

Quote,
The French philosopher Jean-François Lyotard once defined postmodernism as “the death of metanarrative”, meaning that we don’t have, or don’t need, the big stories any more — the ones that tell us who we are, where we came from, and what we are called on to do. I think he was wrong. Without memory there is no identity, and without identity we are cast adrift into a sea of chance, without compass, map or destination.
Unquote
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3933-2123649,00.html

http://www.rte.ie/tv/

http://www.rte.ie/about/executiveboard.html

RTE was probably one of the most offensive and disgusting apologists and propagandists for Islamofascism and Arab racial supremacy untill recently, and whilst they still have a long way to go to reach appropiate standards that one should rightly demand of a State public service televsion broadcaster, they have since the new Director General Mr Cathal Goan has taken over, considerable improved.

Today, Good Friday they were screening the classic film
"Jason and the Argonauts"

http://www.utexas.edu/courses/larrymyth/16Jason.html

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057197/#comment

http://videodetective.com/home.asp?PublishedID=204032

Europe had its own valid and honourable religions and sophiscated cultures long before the Prophet Mohammed came on the scene and the likes of the missionary predecessors of the nitwit pseudo-Christian Archbishop of canterbury Dr Rowan Williams set foot on European soil.

"Jason and the Northern Tribes" unfortunately that is not a sequel, one could only wish! but if you do see the film "Jason and the Argonauts" check out where Jason is recruiting his crew when he first meets Hercules at the Olympiad and Hylas and Hercules compete in a discus throwing match

[ Sorry folks! the cross makes the picture inaccurate for the time line equivalent to the Greek heroes, but it was the nicest picture I could find. ]

http://tkingart.com/

http://www.tropaselite.hpg.ig.com.br/operacao_chastise.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouncing_bomb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Chastise

http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/dambusters.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com

2006-04-10T10:58:00.000-07:00

Dave is surprized that his boomerang has flown right back!

See "The Daily Telegraph" article

David Cameron embroiled in fresh race row
(Filed: 10/04/2006)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/10/ucameron.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/04/10/ixportaltop.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-04-10T09:03:00.000-07:00

Of course, no one asked Hersh how he could compare putting ladies' underwear on the heads of prisoners with Saddam's torture chambers and mass graves.

quote from an excellent article by Jim Kouri.
titled
Seymour Hersh's Fantasyland
http://www.voicesmag.com/Archives/kouri/April2006/seymour_hersh_fantasyland_041006.htm

Which appered in the 10 April 2006 issue of

Voices Magazine
http://www.voicesmag.com

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-04-10T08:18:00.000-07:00

No one's perfect

Former Conservative Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath as reported Today's ( 10 April 2006 ) edition of the quality British newspaper The Daily Telegraph

The late Sir Edward Heath appeared to defend the massacre while paying tribute to Deng Xiaoping after his death. "What happened was that, for a month, there was a crisis in which the civil authority had been defied," he told BBC's Newsnight.

"They (the Chinese authorities) took action about it. We can criticise it in the same way people criticise Bloody Sunday in Northern Ireland, but that isn't by any means the whole story. Why can't we also look at the rest of his achievements?"
Tiananmen? No one's perfect

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/10/wken110.xml

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/10/wken10.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/10/ixnewstop.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/10/dl1002.xml

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-04-07T12:54:00.000-07:00

Fuente: © Conservative Party
http://www.conservatives.com/
CONSERVATIVES: Boris Johnson welcomes UK-China links
/noticias.info/ Shadow Minister for Higher Education Boris Johnson has welcomed the Government's announcement of new initiatives to promote links between Chinese and British universities.Speaking from China, where he is currently on an official visit examining the Chinese Higher Education system, Mr Johnson said:"I am pleased the Government are acting to promote greater links between Chinese and UK universities - clearly spurred into action by my own trip here. I am seeing for myself the huge potential benefits that exist if we get this right, and I look forward to continuing to develop Conservative policy in this crucial area."

http://www.noticias.info/asp/aspComunicados.asp?nid=163458&src=0

2006-04-07T12:32:00.000-07:00

The Conservatives not the Nasty Party! Really?

7 April 2006

To:
Mr Boris Johnson MP Conservative and Unionist Party
http://www.boris-johnson.com/index.php
http://www.conservatives.com/
The House of Commons
Westminster
London
England
johnsonb@parliament.uk

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Mr Johnson

I e-mailed you yesterday, concerning the article which you wrote and and which appeared in the British broadsheet newspaper The Daily Telegraph dated April 6th 2006, page 18, titled,
How a flock of French dodos could drag down Europe

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/06/do0601.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/04/06/ixopinion.html

The points I raised as criticism of your article in my yesterday communication, were not a full and comphrensive listing of what was wrong with your article, which was an appaling piece of garbage, but I was in two minds whether to write another e-mail to you on your article, since I reckoned you would be both decent enough and intelligent enough to realize that with the points I made of criticism of your article in my yesterday e-mail brought to your attention you might check your article to see if there were other problems with it as well, so I would not need to point out the other problems with it. Either way, even if I had written you, a follow up e-mail to yesterday's it would be more as a matter of courtesy and I would have only sent a copy to a couple of senior people in the Conservative Party and one or two people in UKIP http://www.ukip.org/. But...............................

All that was before I heard Francis Maude MP Chairman of the Conservative Party http://www.francismaude.com/
on the BBC Radio 4's flagship News and Current Affairs Programme "The Today Programme" http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/ [ broadcast the Morning of 7th April 2006 ] attacking UKIP over alledged BNP [ British National Party ] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_National_Party connections. Really, I have not changed my views on you personally as outlined in the previous paragraph. What has changed [ after Francis Maude's comments ] is that I could not let what you had written in your article go unpublicly challenged [ and which I did not criticise in yesterday's e-mail ] as to do otherwise might well be to encourage the Conservative Party towards a view that they can impose unreasonable standards on UKIP whilst the Conservatives can do just the hell what they like.

For the record, I regard the BNP as nasty, disgusting and potentially highly dangerous. That said, there are far bigger and more dangerous predators in the sea than the BNP and I am well used to the tactic of the extreme-Left that they will inflate the role of and hype the threat posed by neo-Nazi ideologically based organizations like the BNP, so as to deflect attention from their own anti-constitutional and anti-democratic goals and they [ i.e. the extreme-Left ] also use a spurious opposition on their part to the likes of the BNP, to attract well intentioned but somewhat wet behind the ears [ i.e. naive ] people of a legitimate left-wing persuasion in to their ranks. I would not accuse the Conservative Party of going to those extremes in its attacks on the UKIP over alledged BNP links, but what I would say is that Mr Cameron by refuseing to make an apology to UKIP, is increasingly looking like he will be adopting a position whereby the Conservative Party will seek to brand any legitimate criticism of Conservative Party policy from the right of the political spectrum as being tainted by neo-Nazi and racist ideology.

Well sorry that is not going to work folks, because it is full of Sh-one-t. For example, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Mr Tony Blair MP spends a good bit of his time hanging out with and promoting and propagandizeing in favour of Sinn Fein PIRA, a fully fledged fascisto Stalinist Communist National Socialist [ i.e. Nazi ] organization, which celebrates and is completely proud of its World War 2 alliance with Adolf Hitler's Third Reich. That is the same Sinn Fein PIRA, which is seeking to overthrow the Government of the Irish Republic and impose a single party IRA Fascist Nazi Stalinist Communist State on the entire Island of Ireland and once in power would inevitably turn the manufacturing base of the Republic of Ireland's economy to produce sophiscated biological weapons both for its own use and export to the likes of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda organization, and Mr Cameron has nothing better to do with himself than than to beat up on UKIP because there might or might not be some connection between the UKIP and the pathetic and amateurish BNP.

How many tons of Semtex and how many Kalashnikov have the BNP not a lot I think, which is more than I could say about Sinn Fein PIRA.

David Cameron and the Conservative Party, the BNP's new best friends ? If Mr Cameron wants to continue his silly crusade against the BNP in order to deflect legitimate criticism of Conservative Party policy, well then I would say that the BNP would have no need to try "infiltrating" the Conservative Party, in that Mr Cameron would be doing what the BNP would want them to do anyway, as when mainstream large party politicians dismiss legitimate criticism as being allways someway fascist or neo-Nazi orientated and try to blacken and destroy legitimate fringe partys like UKIP by accuseing them of being fascistic and, or, neo-Nazi, that only drives ordinary and decent people in to the arms of genuinely fascistic partys like the BNP. Which is exactly what has happened allover Europe.

What were you doing in the People's Republic of China [ PRC ] Mr Johnson, because if it was not standing in Tiananmen Square holding up a banner saying "Chinese Communist Imperialists Get out of Tibet" and geting hit over the head with a steel trunchon for your trouble by PRC internal security police and bundled on to the first available flight out of the PRC, your remarks about locking up people in the Bastille,

Quote
More than 3,000 people were arrested yesterday in demonstrations against the French premier's attempt to free up the labour market, the contrat de première embauche. As far as I am concerned, every one of them deserves to spend a night in the Bastille.
UnQuote

may be even more disgracefull than they appear at first sight. Hello Dumbkopf, as a member of both the Conservative Party and being an MP in the House of Commons and also a professional journalist it might have or at least it should have occured to you, that in a democracy; people should have a right to engage in demonstrations without getting locked up in a prison. Furthermore in view of [ when set against your "Bastille" remarks ] your recent visit to the PRC shortly before [ or about the same time or shortly after ] you have written your article, [ and not knowing the nature of your visit to the PRC ], I can not dismiss the possability that you would approve of the PRC's historic and present day practice of murdering people who make legitimate criticism of the PRC Government authorities. Furthermore given your expression of support for de Villepin, who is a close ally of Jacques Chirac who has been a leading campaigner for the resumption of arms exports from Europe to the PRC, I certainly would not dismiss the possability that your article is amongst other things, a piece of groveling propaganda in the service of the mass murdering PRC Communist dictatorship.

Specifically in respect of a French context as regards your comment about the locking people up in the Bastille. Chirac's and de Villepin's administration is not Republican, it is not European, it is not democratic, it is not Gaulist and it is not French: what it is, is heir to Vichy France and the fascistic tradition of Pierre Laval and Marshal Petain. Go to the Village of Oradour Sur Glane France and let's see if you would repeat your remarks of support for de Villepin and locking people up in the Bastille voiced in your article whilst standing outside the ruins of the Catholic Church.
http://www.oradour.info/

Presumably, Mr Cameron is objecting to an alledged link between UKIP and BNP because the BNP is a racist party [ fair enough in so far as whilst any link between the UKIP and BNP is unproven, at least it is generally agreed the BNP is a racist party ] presumably aswell Mr Cameron would argue that being racist is a bad thing. With that in mind [ particularly in view of your recent visit to the PRC ] I would be interested to have your and Mr Cameron's opinion on the fact that the PRC is controlled by Han Chinese and the people of Tibet are a differant ethnic group to the Hans, the PRC is in illegal millitary occupation of the Sovereign Independent Nation State of Tibet, the PRC has murdered Tibetan priests and notables and ordinary Tibetans, destroyed Tibetan art works and Monastrys of world cultural signifigence. It is also my understanding that in Han controlled Communist Party of China occupied Tibet that Han settlers in Tibet are allowed exemption to the "one child rule" whilst ethnic Tibetans resident in Tibet are forced to conform to the one child rule, even to the extent that Tibetan Women have been forced against both their will and against their husband's to have their unborn child aborted as late as eight months in to the pregnancy, ( frankly such practices sound a bit racist to me! ),.

Presumably that fact that I am a terrible cynic would lead me to suspicions that Mr Cameron would find alledged links between the UKIP and BNP more apparently noteworthy than the ongoing cultural and actual genocide of the Tibetan people being engaged in by the Han Chinese and the international Islamofascist Arab racial supremacist threat to exterminate the British people, but then again there might be some idiots who would vote for Cameron and the likes of yourself because he is talking bullshit about UKIP and the BNP, whilst anybody in UK politics attacking the PRC murdering, racism and torture and Arab racial supremacy ideology and Islamofascism is hardly going to find their letterbox cluttered with job offers of non-executive directorships with major companys with 100,000 US Dollars pay checks, should they decide to swap their career from politics for the World of business, and that might have something to do with what Mr Cameron is decideing to focus on!

http://www.tibet.com/
http://www.rangzen.org/
http://www.savetibet.org/
http://www.freetibet.org/
http://www.brown.edu/Students/SFT/
http://www.geocities.com/rusft/
http://www.indiana.edu/~sftibet/
http://www.freepanchenlama.org/

http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=4736

"Islam religion of Peace"
http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/Beslan/aac
http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/Beslan/aad
http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/Beslan/aae
http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/Beslan/aaf
http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/Beslan/aag

With Warm and Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-04-06T12:21:00.000-07:00

It's not the economy stupid, Mr Johnson!

Copy of a letter I have sent to Boris Johnson

To:
Mr Boris Johnson MP Conservative and Unionist Party
http://www.boris-johnson.com/index.php
http://www.conservatives.com/
The House of Commons
Westminster
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

6th April 2006

Dear Mr Johnson

Concerning the article which you wrote and and which appeared in the British broadsheet newspaper The Daily Telegraph dated April 6th 2006, page 18, titled,
How a flock of French dodos could drag down Europe

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/06/do0601.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/04/06/ixopinion.html

You write
Quote
Anyone who cares about the future of the European economy - and it matters deeply to us, the fate of our leading trading partners - should get out to Paris and support de Villepin in a counter-demonstration.
UnQuote

Would that be Monsieur Le Prime Minister de La Republic Francaise Dominique Marie François René Galouzeau de Villepin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_de_Villepin
because if that is who you are makeing reference to, then.

I can not imagine why anybody who would have one shred of Britishness in them, let alone be a prominent Member of Parliament of a supposed British conservative political party should be calling on people to support an ally of Jacques Chirac, unelected by anyone, bureaucrat French establishment drone of the international Arab racial supremacist and Islamofascist allied French Fascist-right political establishment in the person of citoyen de Villepin. The issue is not the economy of France, the issue is that the two main French political partys [ i.e. the so called "conservatives" in Government office in France and the so called "socialists" in opposition in France ], the entire French media, French Academia and French industry is committed to an allliance with international Arab racial supremacist Islamofascism which has as a goal [ i.e. the goal of international Arab racial supremacist Islaomfascism ] the destruction of the United Kingdom as a Sovereign State, the enslavement of the British people and the forced conversion of the British people to Wahabi "Islam" with a very possible end objective of the extermination of everybody in United Kingdom who is not of Arab ethnicity.

With this in mind, my view in respect of the recent fight in France over Chirac's and de Villepin's new employement regulations, is a "plague on both your houses", is that the best thing one could hope for is that the fight over the employment regulations destroys both Chirac and de Villepin and that France continues with its archaic and inefficent employment practices which will further erode the French economy and eventually plunge France in to ongoing economic crisis, so that France or more particularly the evil elites [ which have destroyed what is potentially a great country i.e France ] are unable to further their "Le Grand Project", which involves the destruction of the United Kingdom and the enslavement of the British people along with their forced Conversion to Wahabi "Islam" and possibly genocidal extermination.

As the British Ambassador says to that Nazi German scumbag Ambassador/Foreign Minister in that wonderfull film "The Battle Of Britain"
http://www.bbm.org.uk/prog-bobdvd.htm of Brits ( the British ) with not a small bit of help from the Poles
http://avstop.com/History/AroundTheWorld/Poland/index1.html
, the Czechs
http://www.battle-of-britain.com/BoB2/Battle_personnel/Profiles/RAF/frantisek.htm
de Gaulle's Free French http://perso.wanadoo.fr/memoire78/pages/ffl.html
and volunteers from de Valera's Irish Free state
http://www.rte.ie/radio1/story/1034277.html and quite few others giveing two fingers to the Third Reich Jew exterminating Nazis and their partners in crime like Pierre Laval and Marshal Petain after the Nazi Ambassador/Foreign Minister spews out his venom and dangles his carrots at the British Ambassador in threatening to make London another Rotterdam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Rotterdam
http://members.lycos.nl/DeeJay/luvaeng.html
or be part of the glorious Germanic Aryan Hitlerian Thousand Year Reich
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/
the British Ambassador asks "would you like two spoons of sugar in your tea". I wish you well Mr Johnson and enjoy your French Champagne and Iranian Beluga Caviar at the Hotel de Matignon.

Yours Sincerely
Best and Warm Regards
And I lookforward to seeing you as a defendant at a future Nurnburg War Crimes trials http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/nuremberg.htm
if you want to make a career of carrying-on in the spirit of your ridiculous newspaper article!
Adrian Wainer

PS I suppose there might be some perverted logic in your party leader Mr David Cameron MP accusing the United Kingdom Independence Party UKIP http://www.ukip.org/ of being "closet racists" [ see The Daily Telegraph article and second leading editorial ]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/05/ncam05.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/05/ixnewstop.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/05/dl0502.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/05/ixnewstop.html

in that with the UKIP being absolutely opposed to any acceptance of the proposition that Wahabi Islamofascist Arab racial supremacists, with or without the help of their political elite French Axis of Evil partners, have some sort of God given right to destroy the British State and enslave and, or exterminate the British people, it might well appear to yourself and your party leader that UKIP and its members are quote"racists" unquote, that is if being a quote "racist" unquote in the view of Mr Cameron and your goodself means that, believing as UKIP and its members do, that the British are as good as anybody and a lot better than a bunch of fascist Arab and fascist French trash.

2006-03-30T09:53:00.000-08:00

In the Reign of Charles III, God help Us.

A copy of an e-mail I have sent to The Times

30 March 2006

To:
The Editor The Times [ newspaper ]
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Sir,

"To them that come after us," Glanvill wrote, "It may be as ordinary to buy a pair of wings to fly to the remotest regions, as now a pair of boots to ride a journey; and to confer at the distance of the Indies by sympathetic conveyances, may be as usual in the future as by literary correspondence . . . I doubt not posterity will find many things that are now rumours verified into practical realities. It may be that, some ages hence, a voyage to the Southern tracts, yea possibly to the Moon, will not be more strange than one to America . . . the restoration of grey hairs to juvenility and the renewing of the exhausted marrow may at length be elicited without a miracle; and the turning of the now comparatively desert world into a paradise may not improbably be effected from late agriculture." http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4086596,00.html

Joseph Glanvill, philosopher, clergyman and chaplin to Charles II of England, 1661.

Concerning your paper's [ The Times ] leading editorial, page 23, published on Monday 27th March 2006 titled:

A ROYAL SUCCESS
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2105066,00.html

The British Monarchy have detoriated from King Charles II haveing a scientific philosopher in such a forward looking personage as the amazeing Joseph Glanvill as an advisor, to in the person of His Royal Highness Charles Prince of Wales and God help Us the future King Charles III hanging out with a bunch of barbaric Women murdering, Christian persecuting, Arab racial supremacist pseudoIslamic Wahabi bandits known as the Saudis. The Saudis are poison and the cretinious guff which appeared in your paper's beyond idiotic editorial, is either stupidity of the highest level or blatant appeasement of Islamofascism. Frankly the one and only thing we should be doing in relation to the Saudis is going hell for leather in eliminating our dependence on imported oil supplies with biofuels, wind, wave, tidal, ocean current and solar energy alternatives backed up by clean burn coal. It is madness of the highest order to be seeking friendship let alone being dependent for essential energy supplies on a country like Saudi Arabia which is ruled by an evil cult in the shape of Wahabism with ingrained assumptions of Arab racial supremacy and which decrees that all non-Muslims should be put to the sword.

From your editorial
Quote
And though not all the future judges and imams graduating from this university shared his more tolerant vision of Islam, they can only have been flattered that a future head of the Church of England recognised the debts that Christianity and Judaism, the two other Abrahamic faiths, owe to Islam.
UnQuote

Ooops sorry, since when was Prince Charles Jewish and whilst as a Prince of the realm he would have authority to speak on behalf of British Jews and Judaism, his remarks in this context are utterly disgracefull in that whilst the Jewish people and Judaism do owe a debt to Islam, they owe nothing to the Wahabis. The Turkish Ottoman Caliphate which rescued the Sephardi Jewish people from al-Andalus [ Spain ] in the face of Christian persecution of the Sephardi Jews had the right idea in that by contrast to the posative relationship it [ i.e. the Caliphate ] had with Jews and Judaism the Ottoman Caliphate thought the best way of dealing with Wahabism was using military force to annihilate it. As for "Christianity" if he [ i.e. the Prince of Wales ] is talking about "The Church of England" haveing some relationship with Wahabi Islam, he might be right since like Wahabism the Anglican Church of England is another bonkers cult, but that said the Anglican Church of England has little or nothing to do with Christianity and just because it [ i.e. the Church of England ] is a disgrace and mad does not give the right to the Prince of Wales to associate Christianity as a whole with the Wahabi cult.
As for Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall, marrying her is probably one of the things Charles has done right and one can only hope that she might tell her husband [ i.e. Charles Prince of Wales ] that if he wants to destroy the British Monarchy he should do exactly what he doing now i.e. hanging out with Wahabis, Islamofascists and Islamonazis. Really I think it is a great pity that the deceased Queen mother The Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes-Lyon the former Queen Consort http://www.qmmemorial.gov.uk/output/Page4536.asp
or the late Lord Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Battenburg
http://www.regiments.org/biography/royals/1900louM.htm http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,1101420608,00.html
are not still around as I believe they would have read Charles the riot act about his cosying up to Islamofascism, Islamonazism and the Wahabis.

And as a side note I would say that I would much prefer if Camilla was given a different title to that of Duchess of Cornwall, as that reminds me too too much of the dreadfull Simpson woman in the person of the Duchess of Windsor who like her [ i.e. Mrs Simpson's ] husband the former Edward VIII
http://www.royal.gov.uk/OutPut/Page143.asp http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Edward-VIII-of-the-United-Kingdom
seems to have taken only too enthuastically to hanging out with Nazis ( a dreadfull charactoristic that the present Charles Prince of Wales seems to have unfortunately inherited ) and perhaps "Princess of the Falklands and Gibraltar" as two British territories which have played an important role in giveing fascists a bloody nose would be a more appropiate title for Camilla than Duchess of Cornwall.

One that was prepared earlier and should not be repeated today!http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Image:Nazi-Windsors.jpg

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian wainer

2006-03-27T11:23:00.000-08:00

Catholic Superheroes

With the Catholic Church being one of the few organizations which is willing to stand up against the Islamofascists, one can only wish the Catholic community every success with this Catholic Superheroes comic book publishing project!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/03/26/ncomic26.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/03/26/ixhome.html

http://www.arcadiuspress.com/

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-27T10:46:00.000-08:00

Jack Straw in the running again for Dhimmi of the Month award!
[ March 2006 contest ]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/03/25/do2502.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/03/25/ixopinion.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-24T07:14:00.000-08:00

The yes but no but yes, Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams.
http://www.littlebritain.tv/characters_vicky.htm

A copy of an e-mail I have sent to The Daily Telegraph

24 March 2006

To:
Mr John Bryant
Acting Editor
The Daily Telegraph [ newspaper ]
London England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Mr Bryant

Concerning the second leading editorial, which appeared in The Daily Telegraph, page 21 edition Wednesday 22 March 2006, titled
Intelligent by design
http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/03/22/dl2202.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/03/22/ixopinion.html

Since you [ Mr Bryant ] have taken over the editorship of The Daily Telegraph with the Barclay brothers being the owners of this publication, The Daily Telegraph has declined from being one of the World's few truly great newspapers to being a nauseating piece of jumped-up semi-intelectual and somewhat sinister and potentially highly dangerous written projectile vomit.
What idiots do you think you are dealing with, that you presumably think you can pass off the long established ( but no less respectable for that ) argument that the likes of the Jewish/Christian account of creation should not be taken literally and as a result can live quite comfortably and without disagreement with leading edge science such e.g. as chaos theory, quantum theory and sub atomic particle research, as if this issue was some sort of new startleing revealation. The reality is that the Universe is not merely more complicated, beautiful and intricate than is imagined by most people it is more complicated, beautiful and intricate than it is possible to imagine.

Frankly I have not bothered to read whatever tosh [ i.e. garbage ] the nauseating charactor known as the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams has come out with in the Hampstead Champagne Socialist readers crypto-Stalinist Communist, modern day faux British, Goebbelsian daily hate sheet "Der Sturmer"
[ http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/sturmer.htm ]
AKA The Guardian
[ http://www.guardian.co.uk/ ],
in that arguments about theorys dealing with the creation of the Universe, though an intresting area of debate are pretty insignificant compared to the issue that The Church of England is Evil with a capital "E", in that it has willfully chosen to align itself with Islamofascist Arab racial supremacists who wish to impose Sharia law on the United kingdom and exterminate and, or, enslave the British people for not being part of the Arab masterace and exterminate everybody in the United Kingdom who is not a Muslim and refuses to convert to Islam along with all British Muslims who would give their loyalty to the Queen [ Elizabeth II ] and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Yours Etc
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-16T13:37:00.000-08:00

Happy St Patrick's Day

http://www.ireland.com/cartoons/turner/2006/0316/

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-12T09:13:00.000-08:00

The Day a Nuke hit our port

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49223

A valueable article by Robert Pfriender which appeared in WorldNetDaily

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-08T10:43:00.000-08:00

Sunday April 14th 1912

White House Lines RMS President Bush has hit an Iceberg Stop GOP Republican Party Lines and Democrat Party Lines ships raceing to the rescue Stop This is expected to be a major disaster Stop Captain Dubya knew nothing but when advised of Iceberg to Port Stop decided to steam full speed ahead Stop RMS President Bush sinking Stop The Captain must have been insane says New York Congress man Peter King

recent picture of RMS President Bush
http://www.starway.org/Titanic/pictures/Titanic%20B&W.gif

Larry Johnson, a former CIA officer who now heads the Business Exposure Reduction Group (BERG), believes he knows what could be motivating Hunter, Collins and other members of Congress to oppose the DPW deal."There is current intelligence that individuals with ties to jihadist terrorist groups have sought refuge in Dubai/UAE, within the last three months," from countries that are considered sympathetic to terrorists, Johnson said. "They felt more secure going to the UAE."

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

Read the CNSNEWS.COM article:

Former CIA Officer: Dubai Ports Not So Secure
By Jeff JohnsonCNSNews.com
Senior Staff Writer
March 08, 2006

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200603\NAT20060308a.html

2006-03-07T09:43:00.000-08:00

Lost in a fantasy World of his own.

"It's now an out-of-control political problem." said Scott Reed, a GOP consultant refereing to White House support for the sale of six or is it twenty two US ports to the United Arab Emirates based company Dubai Ports World. Sorry Scott, a nice try at damage limitation there, but this baby is going down faster than the Hindenburg at Lake Hurst New Jersey, and you can spin all you like but the "out-of-control political problem" is not the sale of the Ports, that's only a side effect of haveing an individual in the White House who is increasingly resembling a raveing madman lost in a fantasy World of his own and that's the elephant in the liveing room, "out-of-control political problem" that the GOP needs to wake up to!

read the forbes magazine article:

Hill Democrats, GOP Moving on Ports Issue
By LIZ SIDOTI , 03.07.2006, 05:32 AM

http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/03/07/ap2575068.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-07T09:26:00.000-08:00

Strange days indeed!

It is not often that I find myself agreeing with Maureen Dowd, then again with somebody like George W Bush being in White House, rather than where he should most probably be, and that's in a Psychiatric Hospital, these are strange days indeed.

Read the San Mateo County Times article:

GOP to Bush: Youre nuts!

http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/oped/ci_3538186

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-06T06:28:00.000-08:00

Child cruelity in the UAE enters ports debate

But an HBO crew in late 2004 showed Miller a recent undercover tape showing children racing camels. Miller was furious. In an interview last year, he said the UAE "duped" the U.S.

Former Rep. John Miller, a longtime Seattle Republican and now a top official at the State Department.

Read the Seattle Times article "Camel Jockeys become issue in Ports deal"

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002844760_johnmiller05m.html

Best and Warm
Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-05T13:26:00.000-08:00

All the News that is fit to spin, launder and generally misrepresent

Or how much of the mainstream American media has sought to hoodwink the American public on the Ports sale, presumably if the sale to Dubai Ports World went ahead and a good bit of New York went up in a terrorist nuclear fireball they would be telling American mothers to sprinkle plutonium on their children's cornflakes if they want them to grow up big and strong. Good Night and Good Luck You will need it!

check out the Media Matters for America report:

Top ports deal myths and falsehoods
http://mediamatters.org/items/200603030005

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-05T12:58:00.000-08:00

"scrap the committee, start again"

Says Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security Committee speaking about the disastrous failure of the US regulatory systems to expose the flaws in the proposed takeover of a number of American Ports by the United Arab Emirates based Company Dubai Ports World.

read the Forbes.com article at:
http://www.forbes.com/technology/ebusiness/feeds/ap/2006/03/05/ap2571142.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-04T09:45:00.000-08:00

America leaves her doors open to a nuclear terror attack

Our Biggest Security Gap
By Michael H. Michaud
Mar 2, 2006, 17:01

For Maine, and in fact the entire northeast, our port and maritime security is at even a greater risk following the decision to close Brunswick Naval Air Station through the most recent BRAC round. I do not believe that we should be closing such a critical security asset. The reality is that once a weapon of mass destruction reaches a US port, it is too late. The security provided by Brunswick could have been used to help prevent this kind of incident.

Michael H Michaud

Rep. Michael Michaud represents Maine's 2nd District in the U.S. Congress

read "The Magic City Morning Star" article at:

http://magic-city-news.com/article_5448.shtml

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-03T12:31:00.000-08:00

Top Republican vows to halt US ports deal

"Dubai cannot be trusted," said Duncan Hunter, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and normally one of the administration's most trusted allies. He called the United Arab Emirates "a bazaar for terrorist nations" and said the United States should not let DP World take over significant operations at six US ports.

read the full article which appeared in Hong Kong's "The Standard" newspaper at:

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=17&art_id=13370&sid=6908826&con_type=1

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-02T07:35:00.000-08:00

Bush's plan to save his ass over the Port's fiasco

He is going to ask the VP [ Vice President Dick Cheney ] to invite the Management of Dubai Ports World on a duck hunting trip!

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-03-01T11:48:00.000-08:00

Sink the Dubai Ports Deal!

A valuable article by R. Cort Kirkwood March 20, 2006

http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_3462.shtml

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-03-01T06:42:00.000-08:00

That Texas Good Ol'Boy George W Bush is selling America Up the Creek.

Iconic commentator Bart Whiteman, tells it like it is, in his article titled "Bush Cartel Closing Ranks" which appears in "the Chattanoogan.com"
http://www.chattanoogan.com
website.

Bush Cartel Closing Ranks
http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_81175.asp
by Bart Whiteman
posted February 28, 2006

by Bart Whiteman
posted February 28, 2006

"There was a time when it was rumored that organized crime ran the docks. The crime going on now is not just organized, it’s choreographed, programmed, funded, licensed, contracted, and tenured. They don’t have to cut corners. They design the corners."
Bart Whiteman 2/28/2006 commenting on President George W Bush's backing for the sale of the British Company P&O's US ports operations to the United Arab Emirates based company Dubai Ports World.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-28T09:55:00.000-08:00

When Bush Worlds Collide It's any Port in a Storm!

http://www.filmtotaal.nl/images/wallpapers/full/whenworldscollide/1_1024.jpg

A view on the present fiasco by Patrick J Buchanan

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49030

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-02-27T14:01:00.000-08:00

International Brotherhood of Teamsters The Worlds Most Poweful Labour Union

webpage on their fight to keep US Ports safe

http://www.teamster.org/divisions/Port/secureamericanports.htm

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-27T09:56:00.000-08:00

Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

27 February 2006

To:
The Editor
The Times
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Sir,

Concerning the article written by Mr Irwin Stelzer which appeared in The Times, edition 27 February 2006 titled:
When the ingrates met the hypocrites
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2060038,00.html

leaveing aside the headline above and the subheadline immediately below:
Quote
Inept American self-interest and Conservative toadying in Washington make an unedifying mixture
UnQuote
Mr Stelzer's article is quite reasonable and intelligent from the first paragraph

Quote
TONY BLAIR only recently learnt something that his critics say should have been obvious to him for years: gratitude is not a virtue that George W. Bush has in abundance. .................
UnQuote

through to and inclusive of intermediate content.

Quote
For more months than was decent, the White House refused to appoint an Ambassador to Great Britain, denying Blair an on-site spokesman to help to defend the Anglo-American position on Iraq.
UnQuote

After Mr Stelzer rightly notes the fiasco of the failure to appoint a US Ambassador to the Court of St James, he [ i.e. Mr Stelzer ] goes off the deep end. The United Kingdom is a democratic country and the Conservative Party is a democratic party, if officials of Mr Bush's administration and members of the Republican Party wish to meet members of the Conservative Party whilst such members of the Conservative Party are on a visit to the United States, it is a perfectly respectable and proper thing for them to do. Furthermore the former leader of the Conservative Party Mr Michael Howard and the former Conservative Foreign Secretary Mr Malcolm Rifkind both of whom I previously described and I would argue I did with ample justification as, "the Jews for Hitler and bin-Laden wing of the Conservative Party" were not selected by Mr David Cameron to be amongst his front bench "shadow ministers" and as a result are not now on the Conservative front bench. On the other hand, Mr Cameron has selected the former leader of the Conservative Party Mr William Hague who has been and continues to be a loyal and long-term friend of the USA to be Shadow Foreign Secretary, Mr Cameron has also selected another former leader of the Conservative Party Mr Ian Duncan Smith as Chairman of the party's Social Justice Policy Group who has been and continues to be a loyal and long-term friend of the USA. Really is Mr Seltzer saying that the Bush administration and the [ US ] Republican party should have given the "cold-shoulder" to people like that? well if he is, that's just stupid!

Mr Stelzer writes
Quote
The Tories are on a political upswing just as Blair is entering one of the most difficult periods of his tenure in Downing Street, during which he has continued his support for Bush’s War on Terror by pushing for longer detention periods for suspected terrorists, identity cards and curbs on glorification of terror. In the excruciatingly difficult trade-off between civil liberties and national security, Blair has come down on the side of security, the Tories on the side of civil liberties. While a top Tory contingent was seeking the prestige that a visit to the White House can confer, their colleagues were voting to make America’s War on Terror more difficult, and to embarrass the Prime Minister.
UnQuote

When Mr Stelzer writes, Quote " In the excruciatingly difficult trade-off between civil liberties and national security, Blair has come down on the side of security, the Tories on the side of civil liberties. ", UnQuote, Mr Stelzer is being factually incorrect in that Mr Stelzer is either unaware of or is choseing to leave out the challengeing to his argument issue, that Prime Minister Tony Blair has a Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde personality http://www.victorianweb.org/books/suicide/06e.html
in respect of the War against Islamofascism or as Mr Bush describes it "The Long War", which he [ i.e. Mr Blair ] acquired [ i.e. the Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde personality ] sometime in the last six months. The reality is, that whilst abroad Tony Blair acts as a firm ally of the United States in the fight against Islamofascism e.g. in respect of the deployment of British troops to Iraq and Afghanistan and showing support for the Bush administration when he visits Washington. Whilst at home in the United Kingdom Mr Blair in so far as policys which apply to the United Kingdom are concerned, the Prime Minister is on the side of the Islamofascists. There will allways be a trade-off between civil liberties and the right of society to protect itself from the likes of terrorists and fascists, however the Conservative Party is not opposeing Blair's new laws out of a well intentioned but faulty analysis of the balance which is required beween civil libertys and the need to defend society from terrorism, nor are the Conservatives saying to hell with both civil libertys and the need to protect society from terrorism, in the pursuit of electoral popularity. Why the Conservatives are opposing the Blair legislative programme on such issues, is that the Labour Party i.e. the present party of Government in the United Kingdom, does not want to challenge Islamofascism in the United Kingdom for fear that the Labour Party will lose seats in the next national British election as a result of ethnic Muslim communitys in the United Kingdom punishing the Labour Party for denying the right of Islamofascists to exterminate the British people [ i.e. exterminate everybody in the United Kingdom who is not a Muslim and murder all British muslims who support the rule of law, are loyal to the British state and hold western enlightment values ] . So when Blair is seeking to introduce measures such as "identity cards", this is not part of the fight against Islamofascism and whilst it might be justafied if it was and came after a number of other measures which are not being introduced and should be before one would consider introducing identity cards, the reality is that the likes of the introduction of identity cards are for the purpose that Blair and New Labour can pretend to be fighting Islamofascism [ in the United Kingdom ], when they are doing no such thing. EG There is a real possability about 50/50 that a Western city will be destroyed by a covertly placed no warning nuclear bomb detonated by Islamofascist terrorists within the next 10 years. It could be New York USA or Los Angeles USA or equally it could be London England or Glasgow Scotland. The introduction of identity cards are an issue from the point of view of civil rights and their introduction would cost a huge sum of money, whilst sending a DVD of how to cope with the aftermath of a terrorist nuclear attack to every school and library in the United Kingdom would cost a tiny amount of money in terms of overall Government spending. So why would Labour be doing things like introducing identity cards but not doing things like producing and distributing a civil defence public information "nuclear attack" DVD. Well why? and the answer is that British Muslim Islamofascist sympathizers are happy to see British society strangled in red tape [ with things like a "national identity card" ] which does little to make life difficult for murdering Islamofascist terrorists but certainly would not like to see something like the DVD I have suggested, in that people seeing such a DVD about a nuclear attack might decide that it was time to stop treating British Islamofascists, their sympathizers and fellow travellers with kid gloves.

With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-27T09:50:00.000-08:00

The Hudson institute http://www.hudson.org/ sells America down the River.

26 February 2006

To:
The Business Editor
The Sunday Times [ newspaper ]
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Concerning the article:
Dubai Ports is cast adrift by political games
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2095-2058398,00.html

written by Mr Irwin Stelzer which appeared in The Sunday Times, dated 26 February 2006

Mr Stelzer's article is puerile garbage and judgeing by the photograph which appears of Mr Stelzer alongside the article, if he is not the oldest looking wet behind the ears seventeen year old high schooler [ which if he was, his article would be excuseable ] I have ever come across, well then if he is not a teenager, he is old enough that he should know he is writeing rubbish.

If a United Arab Emirates company had bought a novelty snow scene globe manufacturer that operated out of an industrial park in Chatsworth California USA, and people were going around saying this was a threat to US national security, it would be fair enough to say that would be ludicrous. On the other hand, the possability of Islamofascist terrorists placeing a nuclear weapon aboard a cargo ship http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Uk/UKOrigin.html and detonating it in a US port is all too real a threat.

Adolf Hitler was Adolf Hitler and Mr Irwin Stelzer is Irwin Stelzer and I am not saying they are the same. That said, in so far as his article is concerned, Mr Stelzer shares something with Herr Hitler and that is the ability to present a number of detailed and accurate facts and combine them to produce an argument which though seemingly plausible and intelligent to non-specialists and to some less than brillant experts, is absolute rubbish.

Frankly, if that is the best that Mr Stelzer can do, he would be doing us and the US a favour if he could devote himself to something like writeing about trout fishing in the Appalachian mountains, a subject which would be unlikely to get thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent people un-necessarily murdered, even if he made a mess of it, which is more than I can say for his present activities, judgeing from the aforesaid article.

With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-25T09:48:00.000-08:00

The Times goes blundering about in other people's backyards

25 February 2006

To:
The Editor
The Times
London
England

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Sir

Concerning your second leading editorial:

PORTS AND STORMS
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2057246,00.html

which appeared in The Times, edition February 25 2006.

Quote:
P&O is now in the process of being bought by Dubai Ports World, a company that is owned by the Government of the United Arab Emirates. It would have exactly the same authority and duties as those of the British firm.
UnQuote

And that is why, the sale to Dubai Ports World is unacceptable, for the reason that in the event of Dubai Ports World takeing charge of the US ports, they would be run from Dubai, in which case and quite properly so, that would place the activities and practices of the day to day operation of the Ports outside US jurisdiction. Is your paper seriously argueing that a business operation run in the United Kingdom as presumably P&O currently is, is compareable to a business operation run in a semi-democratic country such as the UAE in terms of checks and balances that a company would operate under. Furthermore, if you would wish to charactorize opposition to the Dubai Ports World accquisition as being predicated on the basis that the Dubai Government authorities would seek attack the USA through their future ownership of P&O's American port operations, you people in The Times are even bigger idiots than you have made yourselves look with your stupid editorial. In that criticism from respectable quarters about the proposed acquistion of P&O's US port operations, is based on the premise not that the UAE Government would use Dubai Ports World proposed US ports operations as a vehicle to attack the USA, but haveing Dubai Ports World take over P&O's US port operations would open opportunities for third partys to attack the USA.

I would particularly draw your attention to the possability of using a commercial cargo ship as a delivery system for a nuclear strike.

You may find the following weblink of interest:

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Uk/UKOrigin.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-24T12:56:00.000-08:00

Arabs buy Bush's bed, George W not told until after A.M. Coffee

http://cagle.msnbc.com/politicalcartoons/

http://www.cagle.com/news/BushArabs/main.asp

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-24T12:09:00.000-08:00

Danish Terrorists Set Off Deadly Cartoons Across Middle East

see weblink

http://www.bigfib.com/issue62/head1-en.html

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-21T08:06:00.000-08:00

A nuclear 9/11 comeing to an American Port soon?

A threat raised by the proposed sale of ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Orleans and Miami to Dubai Portsworld, a United Arab Emirates based Company.

Details of "Hurricane" British nuclear weapons test.

The test was devised to investigate the effects of a ship-smuggled bomb (a threat of great concern to the British at the time).

Hurricane

Test: Hurricane
Time: 0000 03 October 1952 (GMT);23:59:24 02 October 1952
GMT)??08:00 03 October 1952 (WAST)
Location: Off Trimouille Island, in the Monte Bello Islands, Australia20.40 S, 115.57 E
Test Height and Type: Ship, -2.7 m Yield: 25 Kt

weblink:

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Uk/UKOrigin.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-21T07:07:00.000-08:00

"I think the President's gone Insane.", Mr Peter Gadiel refering to US President George W Bush, as quoted in an article which appeared in the British newspaper "The Times" Tuesday 21 February 2006, titled:

Security fears over P&O sale

weblink to article:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13129-2049795,00.html

Best RegardsAdrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-02-21T06:40:00.000-08:00

Meanwhile in a parallel Universe

Meanwhile in a parallel Universe, Catholicism is "The religion of Peace", a wickedly satirical essay by David Aaronovitch in the tradition of that great man of letters and Dean of St Patricks Cathedral Dublin, Jonathan Swift , which appears in the British newspaper The Times, edition 21 February 2006 titled:

"Whovever insults the one true Church deserves to be killed." (News report)

link to Mr Aaronovitch's article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2049788,00.html

Unfortunately it is pity that in this Universe as opposed to the fictional parallel Universe Mr Aaranovitch describes, that the Catholic Church which today despite many past misdeeds is earnestly trying to follow the example of Christ, is constantly attacked by the do-gooder Left, whilst at the same time the do-gooder Left cheerleaders every evil that quote the "Religion of Peace" UnQuote, can come up with from cutting off Saudi Princess' heads to sliting the throats of air-hostesses and slaming airliners in to American skyscrapers.

There is a famous phrase"Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do." (Luke 23:34)http://www.keychristianissues.com/Forgiveness.html

However in respect of the majority of the do-gooder Left many of these people have absolutely no entitlement to forgiveness, in that they know exactly what they are doing in activities such as attacking the Catholic Church and cheerleading for Islamofascism, in that the Catholic Church is one of the few organizations which is standing up to the Islamofascists and for the do-gooder Left Islamofascism is their chosen "Trojan Horse" to collapse Western Democratic Society, so they can establish Stalinist Communist Fascism in Europe and American after the Islamofascists have collapsed Western society.

As for David Aaronovitch, if there is a "World Press Award for Exposeing Tyranical Murderous Hypocrisy", I am nominating him for his superb article.

Best RegardsAdrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-02-20T14:38:00.000-08:00

Canadian Journalists say "Publish Cartoons"

www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060220.wcartoon0220/BNStory/National/home

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-20T14:30:00.000-08:00

"McAleese misfires"

letter to The Sunday Times newspaper

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-2047319,00.html

Best regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-20T14:10:00.000-08:00

Mary [ McAleese President of Ireland ] of Arabia as seen by Cartoonist Martyn Turner

http://www.ireland.com/cartoons/turner/2006/0215/

Best Regards Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

2006-02-20T14:01:00.000-08:00

“sheer bloody arrogance”

Diarmaid Ferriter, a history lecturer at St Patrick’s College, Dublin City University refering to Her Excellency President of the Irish Republic Mrs Mary McAleese's remarks in Saudi Arabia about the Danish Cartoons

check out "The Sunday Times" newspaper article

Mary, Mary

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-2047378,00.html

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-19T10:34:00.000-08:00

In the name of Allah the Mercyful and the Compassionate and Journalism 101

19 February 2006

To:
The Editor
Sunday Independent [ newspaper ]
http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/
Dublin
Ireland

From:
Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Dear Sir

Concerning the article, which appeared in the February 19th 2006 edition of your paper "Sunday Independent" page 15, written by Mr Declan Lynch and titled "In an ideal world our Holy Mary would be Pope".

The core of Islam is centered around the affirmation:
"There is no God but God and Mohammed is his Prophet"

Yet Mr Lynch writes.
Quote
I believe she identifies deeply with the distress of Muhammadans at this difficult time. She would identify with the distress of any deeply religious person at a difficult time, because that's the way she is.
UnQuote
[ NB "she" refers to the President of the Irish Republic Ms Mary McAleese ]

A "Muhammadan" is a person who worships the Prophet Mohammed as God, but the Muslim religion is constructed on the basis that God [ i.e. Allah ] is God and Mohammed is not God but a man and a humble servant of God, i.e. God's messenger. Calling a devout and pious Muslim a "Muhammadan" i.e. somebody who worships Mohammed as his God, may or may not be the highest form of insult one could make to a Muslim, but I would have a high level of confidence it is at least near the top of insulting things one could say to a Muslim, should one seek to gratiously insult a devout and pious believer of Islam.

Mr Lynch defends Her Excellency's Ms Mary McAleese's criticism of the Danish Cartoons. See details of her comments in the following:

extract from reuters report

Irish president condemns Prophet cartoons, violence
Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:00 PM ET

RIYADH (Reuters) - Irish President Mary McAleese on Sunday condemned the publication of cartoons depicting Prophet Mohammad but said violence was unacceptable as a way of protesting.
"We abhor the publication of those provocative cartoons, they were designed to provoke, they were designed to be rude, they were designed to inflame, they did all of those things," she said.
"Muslims have every right to feel angry," she told reporters in the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah where she took part in an economic forum.

end of extract.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-02-12T210046Z_01_L1276910_RTRUKOC_0_US-RELIGION-CARTOONS-IRELAND.xml&archived=False

Now lets us see just what is the reality behind Her Excellency's accusations as to the nature of the cartoons. Take the one that has aroused the most anger, the Cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed Peace be Upon Him, with a bomb in its turban. That Cartoon does not criticise Islam, it does not criticise Allah, it does not criticise the Prophet Mohammed. What it does do, is to criticise those who murder innocent people in the name of Allah, Islam and his prophet.

I Would direct your attention to:

63 Surah Al-Munafiqun ( The Hypocrites )
of the noble Koran.

So Mr Lynch is insulting devout and pious Muslims by refering to them as "Muhammadans" whilst praising her excellency for criticiseing cartoons which attack Al-Munafiqun.
Really I am not given with the power of second sight, and therefore I can only put forword possabilities as to why Ms McAleese has chosen to act in the manner she has and Mr Lynch has chosen to write an utterly bizarre article. My opinion of Her Excellency Mrs Mary McAleese is that at best she is a pompous ignoramus who is well intentioned but has not a clue what she is talking about or at worst she is a petty little despot who despises Western enlightenment values, democracy and legitimate religious devotion and faith and is only too happy to serve narrow and selfish interests by betraying the Irish Republic for the sake of selling a couple of container loads of Halal hamburgers to the Saudi Wahabi pseudo-Islamic slave state. As for Mr Lynch, at best either he knows he has not the skill and intelligence to write an article on a very serious subject and decided to anyway, or at worst his article is a pathetic deliberate piece of propaganda in favour of the murderous Wahabi regime in Riyadh.

Your Obedient Servant
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-06T12:36:00.000-08:00

F#cking for Stalin, working towards [ the will of ] the Fuhrer [ Adolf Hitler ], and those rain kissed dreamy spires of Oxbridge [ the elite Oxford and Cambridge Universitys ].

Former Editor of the British paper The Times, Mr William Rees-Mogg has written an article titled: Tolerating the intolerable http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2026548,00.html which appears in that paper , page 20 edition 6th February 2006.

I am hopeing to do a more detailed analyis of Mr Rees-Mogg's article in the near future, but I hope that in the meantime these brief observations will be of some benefit and interest.
Mr Rees-Mogg's article "Tolerating the intolerable" could usefully be described in three short words, these being "stupid, evil and dangerous". Mr Rees-Mogg writes: Locke would not have believed in insulting publications or in violent response End, Quote Well seeing Mr John Locke died in 1704, he is hardly going to be sending an e-mail to The Times to clarify whether or not, Mr Rees-Mogg has properly represented his [ i.e. Mr Locke's ] views. Since I am not familar with Mr Locke's writeings, I can neither confirm nor deny, that Mr Rees-Mogg has accurately presented Mr Locke's writings. But for the sake of efficency, I will make the assumption in this communication that Mr Rees-Mogg has accurately presented Mr Locke's writings. Mr Locke died in 1704 so he could not have seen, the cartoons which were published in the Danish newsaper nor could he have been aware of e.g. the existance of such issues as e.g. the technology of weapons of mass destruction such as e.g. a 10 Kilotonne nuclear warhead in the hands of an Islamofascist terrorist organization and detonated without warning in the centre of a European city e.g. London. So I have my doubts that when Mr Rees-Mogg describes the cartoons which appeared in the Danish newspaper as "insulting publications", with the defacto statement as fact [ on the part of Mr Rees-Mogg ] that is what Mr Locke would think of the cartoons, if he [ i.e. Mr Locke ] was able to board a time machine and transport himself to be with us in the present day, that Mr Rees-Mogg has any justification in adopting such a position.

F#cking for Stalin and those rain kissed dreamy spires of Oxbridge. I have no desire to make a personal attack on Mr Locke or his reputation or the quality of his work. What I do wish to criticise, is Mr Rees-Mogg use of Mr Locke. I can not see that Mr Rees-Mogg illuminates to any particular benefit the present debate concerning the Cartoons by his reference to Mr Locke, it just looks to me like lazy journalism or snobbery, in that if it is lazy journalism Mr Rees-Mogg is happy to put any old rubbish in to his article to pad-out the article and if it is snobbery Mr Rees-Mogg is really not that interested to try to explore the issues raised by the publication of the cartoons in any meaningfull way, but is just interested to show off that he has read something or other which Mr Locke has written. Some people might be impressed that a person writeing in a newspaper can quote from a philosopher, well John-Paul Sartre was one better, he was a revered philosopher. And Mr Sartre spent a good bit of his time f#cking a lot of different women in different countries, well my ideas on sexuality owe a lot those eminently practical people, the British Victorians who maintained that there was nothing wrong with sex "as long as it was not conducted in the street, lest it might frighten the horses", so I would make no criticism of Mr Sartre because he had a colourful and active sex life, where I would take issue with the ideology of Mr Sartre was that whilst he was using the freedom and wealth of Western society to travel extensively and have sex with numerous women at home and abroad, he was also a strident supporter of the USSR, if one was a seventeen year old and conscripted in to the Red Army and then for haveing done nothing wrong but merely to satisfy the sadistic impulses of one's officers, one was set upon by one's fellow conscripts and beaten so badly one had to have one's penis and testicles amputated, one would hardly be likely to have the prospect of a particularly satisfying sex life from then on, so it rather seems to me in relation to his life and his expressed views on the USSR, Sartre's philosophy might usefully be described as "Selfish Bastardism", in that it looks like Sartre thought he had right to F#ck everything in a skirt that appeared on the horizon, but it was the duty of Russian men to be castrated to serve the purposes of the USSR. And it rather seems to me that Mr Rees-Mogg's article is written in a style and for a purpose that panders to a pseudo-intelectual snobery that nothing bad could come out of those rain kissed dreamy spires of Oxbridge, which is just bullshit!

As for our old friend Der Fuhrer Herr Hitler, to whom Mr Rees-Mogg seems so opposed to in his article "Tolerating the intolerable", well Mr Rees-Mogg's position in opposition to Herr Hitler and Nazism in his February 6 article might seem to be somewhat conflicted with a previous article of his [ i.e. Mr Rees-Mogg's ] which appeared in The Times titled "Is this the next Adolf" which discussed the then prominent at the time of the article's publication, Austrian politician Mr Jorgi Haider.

Mr Rees-Mogg wrote in that article:

"......Take the issue of employment policy. Hitler restored full employment in Germany after 1933 as a consequenceof his decision to rearm; full employment in Roosevelt's Ameica came four or five years later, because the American arms drive started later. No historian questions the effect of Hitler's rearmament on the unemployment figures; they only question the use to which the arms were put. To say, as Haider did in 1991, that "the Third Reich had a sound employment policy" is no more than a clumsy way of stating a stastical truism."

end quote.

"no more than a clumsy way of stating a stastical truism", Mr Rees-Mogg fails to point out that Mr Hitler was able to pursue his "sound employment policy" because he was arresting the likes of trade union leaders, putting them in concentration camps and quite often murdering them. Mr Rees-Mogg also fails to point out, that Germany had some of the best and most efficent industry in the World and a large agricultural sector, a highly skilled workforce which was eager to work and eager to work hard, when Herr Hitler took over Germany and it is no particular achievement on the part of Hitler that with those advantages and with the creation of the most evil, efficent and ruthless police state in the shape of the Third Reich that the World has ever seen, that Hitler was able to create full employment and a highly active economic situation in a short time. Mr Rees-Mogg, also fails to point out that it was just a bit unfair on the part of Herr Hitler for him and his beer hall cronies to seize without compensation the businesses of Jewish citizens of the Reich and force Jewish German professionals out of their jobs to fund this supposed Reich Economic miracle and provide new employment opportunitys for "Aryans". Mr Rees-Mogg also fails to point out, that by 1938 Germany was bankrupt and had she not pursued an aggressive policy of acquisition of foreign territory by intimidation and later by actual military action, the German economy would have collapsed. These are not insignificant points, when a European politician would seek to advocate Herr Hitler's "sound employment policy" as a political platform. Mr William Rees-Mogg was at best being incredably sloppy or ignorant or both in his article concering Mr Haider, which would be somewhat strange for such an experienced journalist and perhaps a degree of caution might well be in order, so that one should not automatically assume that Mr William Rees-Mogg's intentions in respect of his article "Tolerating the intolerable" are entirely honourable.

With Best and Warm
Regards Adrian Wainer

2006-02-05T08:58:00.000-08:00

Jack Straw Dhimmicrat of the Month [ February 2006 ] nomination

I wish to nominate the Right Honourable Mr Jack Straw MP Parliamentary Labour Party , Her Majesty's Foreign Secretary, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

http://www.labour.org.uk/maps/locinfo.phtml?ctid=2340&mnu=3

http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029390554

as Dhimmicrat of the month.

reason for nomination.
A Danish newspaper published cartoons which raised valid and proper questions about the place of Islam in European society and in the face of ferocious intimidation of that publication for doing so and ferocious intimidation of the Danish Government and Danish people for seeking to maintain the right of the Danish press to engage in legitimate debate concerning serious issues and the response of those publications in the European Continental Press and the sole paper in the British Isles the Irish Republic's "Irish Daily Star", http://www.thestar.ie/ brave enough to support the right and indeed the necessity of a responsible press to raise such matters by printing these cartoons, the response of Mr Straw was:

"There is freedom of speech, we all respect that. But there is not any obligation to insult or to be gratuitously inflammatory.
"I believe that the republication of these cartoons has been insulting, it has been insensitive, it has been disrespectful and it has been wrong."
end quote, source follows:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=376066&in_page_id=1770

Sophiscated and decent politics on the part of Mr Straw, bullshit to that! I can not see inside Mr Straw's head to known exactly why he did what he did, in criticiseing the publication of the cartoons, but I could make an educated guess:
[ A ] Being he is a well intentioned idiot, who thinks he is doing good.
but I would find another possability more plausible and that is,
[ B ] Mr Straw is seeking to pander to fascist elements within the British Muslim community and he is determined to secure their votes for the Labour Party at the next British general election, even if he has to see ever single person in the United Kingdom who is not a Muslim and every single person in the United Kingdom who is a Muslim but supports the rule of law and Western enlightenment values murdered by Arab racial supremacist Wahabi Islamofascists, if that is what it takes to get the Labour Party returned to Government at the next British General election and Gordon Brown in the Prime Minister's office in 10 Downing Street.

With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer 5 February 2006

2006-02-03T09:02:00.000-08:00

An open letter to the editor of The Times newspaper London England

To:
The Editor The Times
London
England

From:Adrian Wainer
http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Your leading editorial DRAWING THE LINE
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2022354,00.html

Which appeared on page 23 of The Times, edition February 3 2006 [ print edition ].
Is a bloody disgrace, frankly I thought for a moment reading your editorial, that I was makeing some sort of mistake in thinking it was 2006 and not 1936 with Geoffrey Dawson as the editor of The Times doing his that nice, Mr Hitler only wants justice for the German people, thing.

Quote from webpageBritain’s Blindness
http://storm.prohosting.com/~farsight/Appeasers.htm

A. L. Rowse, an Englishman who lived through the events leading up to World War II and after, wrote a slashing book titled "Appeasement: A study in Political Decline" about the political leaders and opinion makers of England and their disastrous appeasement strategy toward Hitler. He begins with The London Times, which during the whole period exercised an extraordinary influence. The editor, Geoffrey Dawson, was ‘by instinct a proGerman’. He took to himself an assistant, Barrington-Ward, who believed that Britain and France had imposed an unjust settlement on Germany in World War I, and that the allies should now pay for their mistake. "The conclusion drawn was that nothing that Hitler did, however immoral, was to be resisted".

end Quote.

The Times writes.
This newspaper has had anguish of its own over whether to reproduce the pictures at the centre of this saga

end Quote.

Well The Times did not seem very "anguished" when it decided to act as if it was a paid public relations agency which had a taken paid contract by the People's Republic of China to promote the image of the PRC [ People's Republic of China ] rather than a serious newspaper committed to democratic values. Of course the matter that The Times' holding company was seeking at about the same time the co-operation of the Government authorities of the PRC in obtaining television broadcasting rights to the PRC television audience, is presumably absolutely nothing to do with such matters. Presumably aswell, the fact that The Times was acting like that and then did a 180 degree u-turn on its PRC coverage, had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that this u-turn happened shortly after other media organizations turned their attention to how The Times was reporting the PRC. Nor has The Times ever seemed very "anguished" that its sister paper The Sunday Times, takes it upon itself to act as a propagandist dirtsheet promoting the Irish fascist Nazi and Marxist Leninist terror organization Sinn Fein PIRA, apparently The Times' "anguish" only comes in to play over the feelings of "moderate muslims", quote "To present them [ i.e. the Cartoons ] in front of the public for debate is not a value-neutral exercise. The offence destined to be caused to moderate Muslims should not be discounted.", end quote; but if you happen to be a widow of a police officer of the Irish Republic's Garda Siochana gunned down by Sinn Fein PIRA Nazis you can apparently just go to hell for all Times newspapers cares about you, and same goes for Irish working class mothers in Dublin's inner City whose children's lives have been destroyed by cocaine imported in to Ireland courtesy of Sinn Fein PIRA's associates' FARC in Colombia and the same goes for Colombian peasant farmers, their wives and children blown to bits in a Catholic Church in Colombia couretesy of mortar technology supplied by Sinn Fein PIRA to FARC.

Nor does The Times seem very "anguished" that the former Conservative Party politician, Michael Portillo whose career took a nosedive for failing to appreciate when the Conservative Party was the British Government of the day and he was Secretary of State for Defence, that the British military special forces unit the Special Air Service was under the authority of Her Majesty the Queen through the agency of the Prime Minister [ as are all British military forces ] and was not and is not a private Army under the authority of the British Conservative Party, in respect of comments made at a Conservative Party Conference at the same time that a colleague of his [ and then a senior member of the Conservative Party ] came out with the most sickening and disgusting raceist remarks. Nor has it seemed to cause "anguish" to The Times that Mr Portillo whilst being a director of the military equipement manufacturer BAE Systems, criticized the British Government for haveing involved itself in placeing British military forces in Iraq, whilst speaking on the BBC's flagship radio station Radio 4 without declareing that he might have a conflict of interest in such issues in that BAE Systems has extensive military export contracts with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which as a Wahabi theocracy is committed to incorporating Europe [ including the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic ] in to a Arabian Wahabi Empire in which all non-Muslim non-Arabs are reduced to slaves of their would be Arab colonial masters or just simply exterminated. Whilst the same Mr Portillo is a regular columnist with The Sunday Times newspaper.

When The Times writes.
Then again, linking the Prophet to suicide bombings supposedly undertaken in his honour was incendiary.

end Quote.

The big problem with that sentance is the word "supposedly", is it changes the sentence from an opinion that one might or might not agree with, to a statement which is factually incorrect. Sorry folks, there is nothing "supposedly" about bombings [ be they British "Muslims" blowing themselves up on the London underground or Saudis slamming airliners in to the World Trade Centre NYC NY 9/11 ] undertaken in honour of the prophet Mohammed PBUH, it is a solid fact. It is entirely reasonable to argue e.g. that these people are sadistic murderers or such like who have completely misinterpreted the spirit and values of the Islam and the actions of the Prophet Mohammed, what is beyond reasonable to argue is that for many of these people who engage in these attacks of terror and for many of the larger number of people in the Muslim and Muslim Arab community who support such attacks, that for such people that they do not genuinely believe that they are acting in the spirit of the Prophet Mohammed [ i.e. as he would act were he alive today ], they are honouring his memory [ i.e. the Prophet Mohammed ] and are acting in accordance with the most basic important and primary principles of the Muslim religion.
Though a lesser matter, [ though only as a result of the utterly disgracefull behaviour of The Times over its inappropate use of the Word "supposedly" ], whilst without the word "supposedly", The Times assertion that Quote, "Then again, linking the Prophet to suicide bombings (supposedly) undertaken in his honour was incendiary.", end quote, is an argueable view, it is skiming the edge of the envelope of credability, in that to adopt the position which The Times I believe is adopting in which the responsability is placed on the Danish paper for publishing the Cartoons for creating an incendiary situation rather than for fanatics for crashing airliners in to skyscrapers and such like in the name of Allah the mercyfull and the compassionate and his Prophet, is either an analysis of a brillant genius who presumably has delved thoroughly in to the arcana of metaphysical speculation whilst studying at an Oxbridge University [ the understanding of which is utterly beyond a mere fool like me as a under-graduate of the Catholic University of Ireland University College Dublin ] or someone body who is sad, mad and bad, in that I would postulate that if one was to apply the apparent reasoning in The Times comment, one could argue that if the crew of a LPG tanker was sailing up the Thames river in London and its crew got stoned out of their minds on Cocaine and thought it would be fun to see what would happen if they opened the valves on the gas tanks and an old pensioner was playing with his dog in the back garden of his house ten miles from the ship and the gas cloud drifted by just as he lit a cigarette, he was solely and entirely responsible for creating this "incendiary" situation and it had absolutely nothing to do with the actions of the ships crew!

The Times, writes.
The Times would, for example, have reservations about printing a cartoon of Christ in a Nazi uniform sketched because sympathisers of Hitler had conducted awful crimes in the name of Christianity.

end Quote.

This equation between printing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban, with printing a cartoon of Christ in a Nazi uniform, is stupid beyond belief, it is like something one would expect to be written [ if done in good faith ] by a wet behind the ears seventeen year old in a school newspaper. The offence which this would cause would be entirely justafied in that the Third Reich was not a Christian religious project it was a pseudo-Darwinistic scientific project, if the Third Reich was a Christian project why were the Nazis busy shooting Polish Catholic priests and puting them in concentration camps and why did they [ the Third Reich authorities ] plan to abolish the Christian churches after they had defeated the Allied powers? Do you think your readers are morons that you can try and foist this sort of Islamofascist propagandaizeing excrement on them, and get away with it?

Yours Sincerely
With Warm and Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-03T08:23:00.000-08:00

Conservatives my Butt, more like invertabrate spineless toadys of Islamofascism.

3 February 2006

In the supposedly British, supposedly Conservative, supposedly Quality newspaper The Daily Telegraph the 3rd February 2006 [ print edition ] page 25 the leading editorial is headlined.

Why we will defend the right to offend
http://www.opinion.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/02/03/dl0301.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/02/03/ixopinion.html

That newspaper talks the talk, but they don't walk the walk!

In the same dated edition of the same paper on page 20, there is a photograph of a person holding a copy of the newspaper France Soir with the front page digitally blanked out!

I would tell these people in The Telegraph to go to hell, but if this type of craven appeasement of Islamofascism constinues they will find themselves in hell soon enough, the hell of a open air concentration camp Islamische Festung Europa!

Their Kamp not mine.

With Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-02-03T07:33:00.002-08:00

Do the right thing!

As usual the Turks are "doing the right thing", in defending free speech, Islam and the honour of the Prophet Mohammed, as a leader of Germany's Turkish Community criticises the Islamofascists who are threatening mayhem and murder and dishonouring the Prophet Mohammed PBUH and engageing in falsewitness in to the bargain by claiming to do so in the name of Islam in response to cartoons of the Prophet in leading European newspapers. But then again this is nothing new [ but still much appreciated! ], since when Spain's Jewish community was menaced by the same fanatical pseudo-religious insanity that today we see in Islamofascism but in the 15th Century on the part of fanatic Catholics, the Turkish Sultan gave refuge to the Jews and even ordered his navy to assist them.

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

link to article in Deutsche Welle, web site article.

Germany 03.02.2006
"Turks in Germany Decry Firestorm Around Mohammed Cartoons"

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1890164,00.html

2006-02-02T13:30:00.000-08:00

A copy of an e-mail I have sent to Edgar M Bronfman
Best Regards Adrian Wainer 02 February 2006

9/11 Unforgiven and how it is High Noon for Islamofascism in Denmark

02 02 2006

From:
Adrian Wainer

To:
Edgar M. Bronfman
President of the World Jewish Congress
New York
New York
USA

Dear Mr Bronfman,

I read with interest your letter to the leading quality British newspaper The Times, published in its letters page, date 01 February 2006, titled
" A free society must respect all its religions"

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,59-2018767,00.html

I presume then, had you been a senior officer of the British colonial authorities of the time, you would have been in favour of allowing the trial of female members of the community at Salem, Massachusetts for witchcraft and then burning them alive and/or drowning them for haveing been found guilty of practiceing witchcraft.
I presume then you would also argue that Satanists who believe that the human sacrifice is a integral and necessary part of their religious practice should be accomodated and allowed to engage in such practices, [ nodoubt if you do, you will be very happy and amongst friends in elite political/financial circles in France and Belgium].

Polymorphic shapeshifters. There is a public clock in Dublin, that has four faces and because it was broken it showed four times, it was popularly known as "the four faces of the Devil", well I will not seek to associate Islamofascist polymorphic shapeshifters with the Devil, since it would be unfair [ to the Devil ] in that apparently the Devil has only four faces, and these charactors have a different lie and a different face for every audience and every minute of every one of the 365 days of the year. In Islam the Prophet Mohammed peace be upon him was a man, i.e. not God who is Allah, the mercyfull and the Compassionate. It is lies and blasphemy of the highest order, for so called "Muslims" to be offended by a visual depiction of the Prophet Mohammed on the grounds that Islam forbids images of the Prophet lest that lead to idolatry, when those same Muslims treat the Prophet Mohammed, not as a humble servant of God but as one and the same thing as Allah. Furthermore in this "Unholy Trinity" which is a mania of contemporary "Muslims", not only does the Prophet get placed on a equal footing with God [ i.e. Allah ], but the most evil and disgusting of near historical and contemporary figures are given prophetic and semi-divine status e.g. Adolf Hitler is widely known in the Arab Muslim World by the honourifics Abu Ali and Mohammed Haider and whilst there has been a torrent of Fatwas denouncing and even calling for the execution of all sorts of people in the West, I have never heard of a single Fatwa which has sought to declare Sheik Osama bin Laden outside of the Islamic umah.

Who you do represent Mr Bronfman? It certainly does not seem to me that you are acting in the best interests of the Jews of America, the wider American community, the International Jewish community or the people of Denmark. I am sure your anti-semitic non-Jewish [ American ] East Coast old money WASP associates in their elite Country Clubs will be only too happy to tolerate your presence in their company, seeing as your letter is an excellent piece of propaganda to suit the purposes of Jew exterminating Arab racial supremacist Islamofascists. And I am sure, the Marxist Leninist crypto-fascist mafia that run much of the Ivy league US University academic scene will be only too happy with your letter alongwith the Hollywood film elite traitors, who decided that after 9/11 "Hollywood was going to War" but this time around (unlike 1939 through 1945), against the United States rather than the fascist thrash.

Really, it shows how utterly degraded much of Islam and much of the Arab culture has become, that in a allmost unceasing rollcall of brutality, genocide, murder, torture, oppression, etc, etc which occurs in the Arab and Islamic World and much of it carried out in the name of Islam or Arabism or both, e.g. the genocide being perpetrated on the black Muslims of the Sudan by Islamofascist Arab racial supremacists, the only thing that is getting much of the Arab Islamic community in a temper is a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban which appeared in a newspaper in a small European country.

You might wish to note it was the Danish people that rescued their fellow Danish Jewish citizens whilst they were occupied by the Third Reich, whilst America as a free country could not be bothered to take even a few Jewish refugees onboard the liner St Louis.

The Danish resistance and the Danish people made sure Denmark did not live up to their Nazi Third Reich occupiers' expectation that Denmark would be a "whipped cream front" and Denmark is not going to be a "whipped cream front" for today's Arab racial supremacist Islamofascist would be colonial slavemaster occupiers of Denmark and oppressors of the Danish people.

Yours Etc
Adrian Wainer

2006-01-26T07:32:00.000-08:00

Its is not morality, it is reality, stupid!

25 January 2006

To:
Charlie McCreevy
Commissioner
European Commission
Bruxelles Belgium

from:
Adrian Wainer

Here is a quote from an item, in the British computer magazine "PC Format"
http://www.pcformat.co.uk/
edition January 2006 page 54 titled, "They're all around us"

They're all around us
There are 30 supercomputers in your home, you know

The manufacturers of yesteryear couldn't possibly have predicted the speeds of today's machines. Seymour Cray, when working for a rudimentary computer company named CDC, certainly couldn't, but he had a fair idea of what constituted a powerful machine at the time. After leaving CDC to start his own company, he produced the Cray 1, generally acknowledged as the World's first supercomputer. Released in 1976 and sold for $9 million (including $1 million for the discs), the Cray 1 sold much better than expected shifting 80 units. Coupled with the 'freon' refigeration system, the whole unit weighed over five tons, and ran at around 136 megaflops.
Compare this to a bog standard destop of today. The whole thing should cost you around £1,100 [ British pounds sterling ], and you won't be charged a million dollars for a copy of windows. It doesn't have intergrated seating, unlike the Cray, but efficency is such that it can be cooled by a selection of little fans instead of a network of copper pipes. And the performance? A 2GHz P4 produces around 4,400 megaflops a second - 4.4 gigaflops - equivalent to over 30 of seymour's machines.

end of quote.

In the time from the end of World War 2 till about the end of the 1970s/early-mid 1980s. The French economy did fantastically well. Whilst the United Kingdom in the same period, lurched from crisis to crisis to the extent by the time Margaret Thatcher took power and started to turn the economy round by introducing free market reforms, things had got so bad that the United Kingdom was looking like a failed state.

The real and genuine success of Margaret Thatcher's free market reforms, often leads people on the right in British politics to act as if they belonged in some sort of cult in which free market capitalism is not argued as a tool to create a better society, but as a "morality cult". Neither "free market capitalism" nor "state socialism" are inherently moral nor inherently im-moral ", they are tools whose results may well be moral or im-moral or some mixture of the two, but they themselves as mere tools are morally neutral.

The problem that the United Kingdom had post 1945, was that all the British partys and much of the British media saw State socialism as the high road to success for Britain, British society and British industry. In of itself the preference for State Socialism was not the problem, the problem was that the British unlike the French do not do State Socialism very well, so they could not make it work. The French do State Socialism very well and to a large extent they did make it work. The problem for the French, is it is not working now, they have no idea how to fix it [ i.e. "French State Socialism"] and there is practically nobody in France that is even recognizeing there is a problem with French State Socialism.

The advantages that the French had in their state run businesses and supposedly "private sector" French businesses, was that such large state, and state supported and directed "private sector" businesses, were pretty well run at a bureaucratic level and had economys of scale that often gave them advantages over e.g. small, medium and large British businesses. However the advent of the super powerfull computer that anybody can buy today in a high street shop for less than circa three thousand US dollars, has meant that small businesses that employ ten or so people or even the guy working out of a shed in his back garden, can employ the sort of tools, which even as late as the 1970s were only available to multinational companys with a turnover in the tens of millions of dollars range and higher.

Since pretty much nobody in France has realized this, France is finished and apart from the French economy going down the toilet, the SH-one-T of this mess hitting the fan, will cause havoc for a lot of other people as well. EG as the French economy continues to detoriate, if past experience is anything to go by, the present and future French Government[s] will only continue and accelerate the practice of pandering to Islamofascism so as to try and prop up the increasingly shaky French economy by seeking to create preferential to French exporters trade deals with hydrocarbon petro dollar rich Islamic extremist orientated regimes and States in return for the French [ Government ] authorities compromiseing France's, Europe's and the international community's security in respect of the threat from Islamofascism.

Francetalibanistan Anyone!

All opinions in this e-mail are my own and should not be assumed to be the same as third partys.

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-01-19T09:45:00.000-08:00

Fruitcake in da 'hood!

Check out the full text of His Honour Mayor Nagin of the City of New Orleans, Martin Luther King Day speech 2006.

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/news/t-p/stories/011706_nagin_transcript.html

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer
18 01 2006

2006-01-19T09:39:00.000-08:00

Question. Is it acceptable to have a raveing lunatic sitting in the Mayor's office of a Major American City e.g. New Orleans?

18 January 2006

President George W Bush, has been portrayed as a fanatical bible thumping maniac by the supposedly "liberal" and supposedly "left orientated" press and media in Continental Europe because he has stated openly he is a Christian and the same press and media were delighted when a senior Italian politician Rocco Buttiglione was denied a position with the European Union because he maintained an open commitment to his Catholic and Christian faith, with the argument being that he would discriminate unfairly against homosexuals, despite the fact that he had publicly stated that he would respect the norms by which homosexuals were treated in European Union States. So presumably this means, that if you are a committed Catholic Christian and support the likes of Holland in its very fair and reasonable treatment of homosexuals in which they have full rights as members of Dutch society you are not fit to to hold a senior position in the European Union but if you happen to be a Wahabi Islamofacist that believes Saddam Hussein al-Takriti as President of Iraq and Chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council was perfectly correct and moral in enforceing Sharia law through the Iraqi state criminal law in arresting homosexuals, wrapping them in carpets and throwing them off high buildings to their deaths and also believe as a Wahabi Islamofascist that anybody who engages in homosexual behaviour in any of the European Union States should be arrested, tried and subject to the death penalty and pending the introduction of such reforms, it is entirely legitimate for concerned individuals to kill homosexuals on a ad hoc basis, that such a person who holds such Islamofascist views would be a fit and proper person to serve in a senior position with the European Union, would seem to me to be the position held by our supposedly "liberal" and "left-leaning" mainstream press and media in Continental Europe.

Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans is as much entitled to his religious beliefs as anyone else, where his position becomes disrespectable is where he crosses the line between the legitimate position of some one like President Bush who openly states his commitment to his religion and has openly stated his political decisions are informed by his religious faith and somebody who is looking like they are candidate for the men in white coats and staitjacket by makeing remarks for which the most reasonable logical explaination would be that Mayor Nagin believes that he has a red telephone hot line in the Mayor's office with a direct connection to Jesus Christ, the Prophet Mohammed, Ra or Zeus or who ever is the Mayor's personal religious preference.

"He [ God ] sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane and it's destroyed and put stress on this country. Surely He's not approving of us being in Iraq under false pretences. But surely He's upset at black America also. We're not taking care of ourselves, we're not taking care of our women, and we're not taking care of our children."

Mayor Ray Nagin of the City of New Orleans, as quoted in the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph 18 01 2006

see article titled "This is how God punished us for invading Iraq"
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/18/wnagin18.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/01/18/ixportal.html

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

2006-01-11T06:20:00.000-08:00

Das Fuhrer Schule

11 January 2006

A copy of an e-mail I have sent to the President of Harvard University

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
http://www.participate.net/user/adrianwainer

http://adrianwainer.blogspot.com/

Das Fuhrer Schule

10 January 2006

To:
Mr Lawrence H Summers
President
Harvard University
United States of America

From:
Adrian Wainer

Dear Mr Summers,

I read with interest an article which appeared in the Sunday 8 January 2006 edition of the British broadsheet newspaper "The Sunday Telegraph" written by a Mr Niall Ferguson who is apparently the "Laurence A. Tisch Professor at Harvard University", with the relevant article titled:
"If Sharon was the immovable object, who now will be the irrestible force?"

and you can find Mr Ferguson's article on The Sunday Telegraph's webpage:
www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/01/08/do0803.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/01/08/ixportal.html

I personally tend towards the "Cock Up theory" rather than "Conspiracy theory" to explain why something smells fishy or is just a mess. However in respect of Mr Ferguson's article it looks to me that it is more "Conspiracy" than "Cock Up" as to why Mr Ferguson has spewed out that very strange item. I would think that people who read The Sunday Telegraph, if they were interested in reading about the Weimar republic would go to a book store and buy a book, i.e. they would not be hanging around waiting for Mr Ferguson to write about it [ in The Sunday Telegraph ]! Really I can not see any legitimate reason as to why Mr Ferguson would be writeing about the Weimar Republic in the way he has in the relevant article, but I could suppose some pretty nasty reasons and I might well be right.

It is a mania of the academic left to portray the State of Israel as a Nazi State, the Jewish people as Nazis, Judaism as Nazism and Zionism as Nazism. Really I do not think The Sunday Telegraph would be happy campers to be publishing "the real Nazis are Jews" propaganda, but it looks to me as if that is just what they have been suckered in to, in respect of Mr Ferguson's bizarre article.

Furthermore if one proceeds along the line of thinking that the real Nazis are the Jews, Hitler and the NSDAP appear in a very different light, in that if one holds to the position the real Nazis are the Jews, one could then advance arguments that Hitler was a legitimate German patriot, the Jews started World War 2 and if six million Jews died during World War 2, they only had themselves to blame because the Third Reich was acting in legitimate self-defense in removeing the Jewish Nazi threat from inside its borders and the Jews only died in large numbers because through their [ i.e. Jewish ] War mongering they blocked German attempts to resettle the Jews in Madagascar.

To move things more up to date, still thinking along the lines that "the Jews are the real Nazis" one comes to the position that Israel is a Nazi Puppet State of a greater Nazi constelation, so that America is the large Nazi State and the United Kingdom the smaller Nazi State with Israel the puppet Nazi State of the USA. Applying this argument to e.g. the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre NYC, this attack becomes not terrorism but legitimate self-defence in that blowing up two buildings and killing about three thousand people does not seem extreme when viewed against the Nazi Axis of Evil which is the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the State of Israel which is intent on exterminating all Arabs and all Muslims and annihilating the Muslim religion.

I have heard that parents have to pay big fees for their children to attend Harvard University, such prospective students need very high academic scores to enter your university and their parents often have to turn their lives upside down getting their children involved in all sorts of activities which would count posatively in respect of their children gaining admission to Harvard. Frankly I do not why they bother, in that if Mr Ferguson is an emblem of the best that Harvard can do, such parents would be better advised to look up the nearest branch of the American Nazi Party in the phonebook, stick pictures of Hitler, Osama bin Laden, Yassir Arafat and the former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem al-Husseini around their house, cook up a pig with an apple stuck in its mouth and dress their Children in Lederhosen and drindl dresses and invite the local Gauleiter around and ask could their children attend any educational activities the American Nazi Party would be offering, since sending one's Children off to be educated by the American Nazi Party would seem to have pretty much the same result as sending them to Harvard and be a lot cheaper and much less bothersome to organize.

With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

PS The Northern Irish Protestant Community are not "settlers" as Mr Ferguson refers to them, they are Irish men and women and British men and women too. And if it was not for the part that Northern Ireland played in World 2, you might be all speaking German in Harvard and as for "affirmative action" to assist the American black community so much favoured by the left in US Politics, the issue of affirmative action for America's black community would not figure in today's politics had the Third Reich won World War 2, since they would have turned America's black community in to soap and lampshades. Also you might like to note that the State of Israel was not a gift of the British Empire, it was created out of the blood, work and struggle of the Jewish People. As for "British Imperialism" no doubt that was what America was fighting against, when American oil tankers were refueling Nazi submarines in the Atlantic when Britain stood almost alone against the Third Reich in 1940

I hope it keeps fine for both you and Mr Ferguson
With Best and Warm Regards
Adrian R Wainer

2006-01-03T07:44:00.000-08:00

This means War in Europe, the only question is when?

Please find below a web link to a valuable article titled "French Intifada:A Clear and Present Danger" which appeared on the website

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/CWN/

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/news/060103a.asp

World
French Intifada: A Clear and Present Danger
By Dale Hurd
CBN News Sr. Reporter

extract from article:

Europe has lived under the threat of Islamic terror far longer than the United States, but it has largely been in a state of denial, as high immigrant birthrates from Muslim nations turn Europe into Eurabia, and Islamic terrorism becomes a homegrown product.

The car-burning ‘intifada’ in the Paris suburbs only fed a growing sense of doom that is now pervasive in France.

Calm has returned to the night in Paris, but the political earthquake that resulted from this rioting is still reverberating. As far-fetched as it may sound, French intellectuals now debate whether the French state is dead.

Author and philosopher Gilles William Goldnadel said, "Yes, I think we're in that kind of situation in France. The state is dead."

Goldnadel says that the traditional state has given way to a leftist fantasy.

"In the quasi-religious system that I have described, the foreigner is kind of an ideal martyr, and the white European native is like an ideal devil,” Goldnadel remarked. “The national state is demonized, and is seen as anachronistic -- old-fashioned.”

end of extract.

2005-12-30T13:14:00.000-08:00

Merry Christmas to the Jewish Christ Murderers from El Presidente Hugo Chavez.

30 December 2005

Chingada! Simon Bolivar must be spinning in his grave as the Venezuelan idiot fascist tyrant Hugo Chavez hints at bringing back the Spanish Inquisition to Latin America.
Regards
Adrian Wainer

report by
Alex BeechAlex Beech is a playwright, analyst, poet, and amateur photographer who operates her own blog.

which appeared in Front Page
http://www.frontpagemag.com/index.asp

A Perilous Hanukkah with Hugo

[ see weblink below for full article from which the following extract is taken ]
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20693

Celebrating on December 24, Chavez said ‘Christmas is a rebellious, revolutionary, socialist Christ…the descendants of those who crucified Christ have taken ownership of the riches of the world, and they have concentrated it in a small number of hands.” Chavez said he was “decided” to change history, and he said that every day, he is joined by a “greater quantity of Chiefs of State and leaders in that struggle.” Among those are Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with whom Chavez recently met. On December 14, Ahmadinejad described the Holocaust as "a myth," months after he suggested that Israel should be "wiped off the map."

2005-12-30T05:04:00.000-08:00

The Conservatives get Conserving!

30 December 2005

By Adrian Wainer

I very much hope you folks out there in internet-land will find the following article,

"Cameron puts money where his mouth is with £1m green house"

written by David Charter, which appeared in the quality British newspaper
The Times; edition Friday 30 December 2005 page 27,

of interest.

Best Regards
And a Happy New Year
Adrian Wainer

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-1963085_1,00.html

Politics

The Times
December 30, 2005

Cameron puts money where his mouth is with £1m green house
By David Charter, Chief Political Correspondent

DAVID CAMERON is so determined to prove his green credentials that he has commissioned an eco-architect to make over his new house, complete with wind turbine on the roof.

The Conservatives’ new leader hopes that the fee of more than £10,000 for Alex Michaelis to provide green heating, lighting, insulation and fuel systems will be recouped on lower bills.

Mr Michaelis, 40, will redesign the Camerons’ new £1 million house in Notting Hill, West London, when they move in next month. Mr Cameron is moving because he wants more room for his disabled four-year-old son and the baby his wife Samantha is expecting in February.

The architect, who has attracted national attention for the design of his own underground home in nearby Ladbroke Grove, said that Mr Cameron was one of a growing number of clients who wanted an eco-friendly makeover.

The Tory leader, who regularly cycles to the Commons, is also acutely aware that environmental issues strike a chord with the younger voters he must attract to make his party electable again. He has already set up a commission to review party policy jointly chaired by the environmentalist Zac Goldsmith.

Mr Michaelis, a partner in Michaelis Boyd Associates, said: “The starting point will be to insulate the existing house, a two-storey Victorian terrace. The basement will also be made bigger for David’s disabled son and will have light wells front and back.

“Thermal solar panels on the roof will heat water and photovoltaic solar panels will convert light into electricity, which you can put back into the grid or do a deal with energy suppliers.”

But the pièce de résistance will be the wind turbine — provided that Mr Cameron can get planning permission.

Mr Michaelis said: “They are slightly bigger than a satellite dish and akin to a spinning aerial. They are 1.75m in diameter and make very little noise. Most people don’t look at roof- scapes anyway.”

He said that his design would incorporate “water harvesting” — a tub to catch rainwater — as well as “recycling grey water” — filtering bath and shower water for use in the washing machine.
Windows will be brush-sealed at a cost of £30 to £40 each and some may be fitted with “K” glass, which cuts heat loss. The solar panels cost between £500 and £1,000, while the photovoltaic panels cost up to £3,000. An air circulation system costing £1,500 will take warm air out of bathrooms and use it to heat colder rooms.

Mr Michaelis said that he was charging Mr Cameron the usual rates for his work with “no special deal” for his celebrity client. “In the last four or five years a lot more people have become interested in eco work and a lot of clients can afford to have it done,” he said.

Mr Cameron said: “Politics is about more than just elections. We are all in this together and each of us can do something to make a difference.”

Kensington and Chelsea council confirmed that it would need to approve the plans for the wind turbine before it could go ahead. If three neighbours were to object, the turbine would go to a planning committee, otherwise officers would accept or reject it themselves.

A planning officer said: “I cannot think of another example of a wind turbine. We deal with requests like this on a case-by-case basis. It all depends on the impact on the building and the setting.”

For his own house, built mostly underground because of a planning restriction limiting it to six feet, Mr Michaelis scoured Europe for the most eco-friendly materials. It is covered in turf to trap heat and give oxygen back to the environment. He has also installed a 328ft borehole tapping into an aquifer to provide his water supply, although this is not planned for Mr Cameron’s house.

“Eco-friendly designs are more expensive,” he said. “We are way behind Sweden, Norway and Switzerland. But as people in the UK become more environmentally aware, costs will reduce. Sustainability and environmental design are going to be the critical words in architecture over the next 20 years.”

HERE'S SOME MICHAELIS MADE EARLIER ...
1993 Office refurbishment for film company in Soho, London
1994 The round bar in Soho House club, Soho, London W1
1995 Moro Restaurant in Exmouth Market, London EC1; Zucca Italian restaurant in Westbourne Grove, W11
1998 Babington House Hotel, Frome, Somerset
1999 Woody’s Nightclub, Harrow Road, London W9
2000 The Kings Arms Bar, Kings Road, SW6; The Prince Alfred, bar and restaurant, London W9
2001 Bar room bar, Alexandra Arms, Victoria Road, E9
2002 Sophie’s Steakhouse, Fulham Road, SW3; Soho House Electric Cinema, brasserie and club, Portobello Road, W10; Organic food stores for Fresh and Wild in Bristol and London W11
All projects undertaken by Michaelis Boyd Associates

2005-12-28T09:12:00.000-08:00

The "British" Labour Government has Passed its Sell by Date

By Adrian Wainer 28/12/2005

Tony Blair's recent bizarre outburst in which he attacked the British political party "UKIP"[ United Kingdom Independence Party ] for still fighting the Second World War, is utterly symptomatic of how the Labour "government" in the United Kingdom has abandoned its duty to Govern the British State in the best interests of the British people, and [ i.e. the Labour Party ] has reverted to what it was before the "Blair" reforms, ideologically incoherent and driven by extremist Left-wing Stalinist fascists with well intentioned do-gooder left-wingers being led up and down the garden path and generally taken for a ride. As Dennis Healy the veteran Labour Party politician put it during the bad old days when the Labour Party had turned in to a national joke and its jester in chief the "politician" Mr Neil Kinnock was it's
leader:
"They are praying in Moscow for a Labour Government" [ i.e. for a Labour party victory in the British general election ].

Well Tony Blair, is the leader of the Labour Party now and the USSR is history, but I rather think that Mr Osama bin-Laden's friends in Riyadh in Saudi Arabia are praying for a Labour Victory in the next British general election!
Whatever the "European Union" started out as, what it is now, is a not very well disguised attempt to create a single European Fascist State stretching from Ireland's Atlantic coast to the Polish border with Russia. The proponents of the European Union, constantly make reference to the Second World War and Fascism and cite how the European Union has held back the creation of aggressive militarism and fascism in Europe, well in the past that might have been true to an extent but it is certainly not true Now! In that the European Union is becoming itself a Fascist vehicle and the only real difference between the 1930s/40s Hitlerian Third Reich Fascist roadmap for Europe and the European Union Fascist roadmap for Europe, is that Herr Hitler was a good deal more honest about his intentions [ than those driving the European Union project ] and most of the time did not sugar coat his objectives in do-gooder politically correct gobble deguk, as the European Union constantly does.

Another [ technically ] significant difference between the European Union single Fascist State project and the 1930s/40s Hitlerian project for a single European Fascist State, is that in the 1930s/40s project, Petain's French Fascists played second fiddle to Berlin, whereas this time round, the French political/military/industrial/media/academic complex is very much in the driving seat of the creation of the new Single European Fascist State whilst Berlin in the likes of former Chancellor Schroeder is the loyal lapdog of the French led European Fascist State project. And as for the current Chancellor Ms Merkel, given her utterly stupid criticism of the British Conservative Party for leaving, the so called European Peoples' Party [ and I suppose the NSDAP was really "socialist" and "nationalist" and pigs could fly and der Fuhrer loved children and small furry animals ] it seems it is business as usual in Germany whovever is elected. Perhaps Mr David Cameron the new Conservative Party leader might be well advised to politely tell Ms Merkel to mind her own business and to suggest to her in to the bargain, that it might not have been the smartest move on the part of the German conservatives in the 1930s Reichstag to form a coalition Government with Herr Hitler and his NSDAP and perhaps going on their past record, that the German Conservatives might be thought by the British public to be somewhat arrogant and not a little stupid [ perhaps more accurately cretinious ] for giveing instructions to the British Conservative Party on who they should make alliances with in the European Parliament. Nodoubt Ms Merkel and her fellow party members will feel exactly at home with the "European People's Party" member Party, the "Irish" Party "Fine Gael" which is commonly referred to in Ireland as the "Blue Shirts" which is a reminder of "Fine Gael's" involvement in 1930s fascism, well today's Fine Gael has not called for a Swastika to be placed in the Irish tricolour, but they certainly can not be faulted for supporting Fascism in other ways be it in calling for Ireland's Shannon Airport to bar all US military traffic or championing whatever initiative comes out of Bruxelles [ i.e. the European Union ] which further strips away Irish sovereignty and paves the way for the creation of the Single European Fascist State.

Well back to Tony Blair's criticism of UKIP for liveing in the 1940s, frankly it is a bit rich of Tony Blair to be criticizing UKIP for invoking the spirit of British determination to stand up to Fascism in 1939/40, when post the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Centre in New York, it has been patently obvious that the European Union is a fascist project and like the Hitlerian fascist project of the 1930s/40s it is allied to and forms an "Axis of Evil" with Arab racial supremacy ideology and Islamofascism.
[ see the website http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/ for more information on Arab racial supremacist and Islamofascist links with Nazism ]

Best Regards
Adrian Wainer